Re: Argument against native HDV

Date : Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:20:08 -0500
To : DS(at)Softimage.COM
From : Timothy Duncan <timothy.duncan(at)gmail.com>
Subject : Re: Argument against native HDV
The reason the screen is bigger during intermediate capture  is because it is stretching the screen from 1440 to 1980 in width upon capture into the intermediate codec.  This way, it is not having to do the up-rez on the fly during editing and output.

td


On 7/29/05, gvision <gvision(at)yesnet.co.za> wrote:
Hi Tony I have tried both the Apple intermediate codec which for some reason when you capture has a bigger window on your screen than the native HDV codec. I don't know if that is significant. There appears to be no difference maybe you know more about that one. As for what does it look like if the exposure is good then the pictures are pretty good but there is not much margin for error when shooting. Its as sharp as digibeta up-resed on an m2000/p with out the aliasing issues the 50i looks better than the 25p. The 25p smears on movement (Like film with the shutter at180 degrees) I don't know if you can control that on either the domestic or "semi professional" camera.
Conclusion: using FCP to conform HDV and then play straight to DS Via HDSDI is not a bad way to go. No machine control issues no audio issues and you won't need to transfer the source timecode to DS just an EDL to show you where the breaks are. Think of it as a really smart VTR (I feel an Apple lashing comming on). I am finishing the feature I am doing on FCP and I plan to do another version through DS time permitting to compare the result of the two work-flows.
 
Contact me off list if you want more detail.
 
Graham
 



Search the Digital Studio List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.