RE: Varicam or HD

Date : Sun, 31 Jul 2005 15:51:29 -0700 (PDT)
To : DS(at)Softimage.COM
From : Symphonycc <symphonycc(at)yahoo.com>
Subject : RE: Varicam or HD
SR can be 444 in file format. But if you shoot SR
1080i it is a better rate then just HDcam 1080i. But
if SR is too $$$ then I would go HDcam and use
uncompress 10bit

Good luck.

Evan


--- Victor Wolansky <victorw(at)NATMEDIA.com> wrote:

> I'm not sure if I understand you. I think my
> questions: 
> 
>  
> 
> If I shoot and record to SR tape, and then I rent a
> SR deck and digitize
> from the SR tape thru the DH SDI output, I will have
> better quality image? 
> 
>  
> 
> For what I understand the SR tape is, if you record
> not in 4:4:4 but in
> 4:2:2 is much better than the 3:1:1 of the HDCAM.
> but it would be good to
> know if some one already tried it.
> 
>  
> 
> Victor Wolansky
> 
> DS VFX Artist
> 
> WEBsite <http://www.e3post.com/> 
> 
> Demo Reel
> <http://www.e3post.com/reels/victorreel.html> 
> 
> 815 Slaters Lane
> 
> Alexandria. VA.
> 
> 443-797-3507
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM
> [mailto:owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of
> Tim Bolt
> Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 12:45 PM
> To: DS(at)Softimage.COM
> Subject: RE: Varicam or HD
> 
>  
> 
> No you shoot and record to SR tape or straight to
> file server and don't go
> near HDCam compression etc.
> 
>  
> 
> Dermot or Rupert might have more to say on exact
> work flows available.
> 
>  
> 
> Ta
> 
>  
> 
> Tim
> 
>  
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM on behalf of Victor
> Wolansky
> Sent: Sat 30/07/2005 15:04
> To: DS(at)Softimage.COM
> Subject: RE: Varicam or HD
> 
> I think is possible, but I do not have a 4:4:4
> capturing board, so the
> question is, the SDI video output of the SR machine,
> is better than the
> 3:1:1 of the HDCAM?
> 
>  
> 
> If we talk in pixels samples per channel, the HDCAM
> is 1440:480:480 is the
> SR SDI any better?? Or you get better info only if
> you capture to DPX
> files??
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Victor Wolansky
> 
> DS VFX Artist
> 
> WEBsite <http://www.e3post.com/> 
> 
> Demo Reel
> <http://www.e3post.com/reels/victorreel.html> 
> 
> 815 Slaters Lane
> 
> Alexandria. VA.
> 
> 443-797-3507
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: owner-ds(at)softimage.com
> [mailto:owner-ds(at)softimage.com] On Behalf Of
> Tim Bolt
> Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 5:37 AM
> To: DS(at)softimage.com
> Subject: RE: Varicam or HD
> 
>  
> 
> Intensive keying - any chance of them stretching to
> SR?
> 
>  
> 
> Ta
> 
>  
> 
> Tim
> 
>  
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM on behalf of Victor
> Wolansky
> Sent: Sat 30/07/2005 07:06
> To: DS(at)Softimage.COM
> Subject: Varicam or HD
> 
> Hi! I need to know what you people think about
> this..
> 
>  
> 
> I've read that HDCAM is 3:1:1   
> http://hd24.com/compression_numbers.htm
> 
>  
> 
> And the DVCPRO HD is 4:2:2   ..
> 
>  
> 
> So the question is source footage is going to be HD,
> but final product SD,
> intensive keying in the project. What format I
> should go????  HDCAM or
> DVCPRO HD??
> 
>  
> 
> Any suggestion? Another format???  
> 
>  
> 
> Please help. help .. help.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> Victor Wolansky
> 
> DS VFX Artist
> 
> WEBsite <http://www.e3post.com/> 
> 
> Demo Reel
> <http://www.e3post.com/reels/victorreel.html> 
> 
> 815 Slaters Lane
> 
> Alexandria. VA.
> 
> 443-797-3507
> 
>  
> 
> 
=== message truncated ===


---- 
Evan Anthony 
Frame:Runner, NYC 

Systems used: 
Avid Nitris HD/SD
Sony Xpri HD/SD
Avid Symphony - R.I.P. 
Avid Adrenaline 
And my brain...Sometimes 
 
 





		
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
 
---
Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: subscribe ds
Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe ds


Search the Digital Studio List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.