Re: Varicam or HD

Date : Tue, 02 Aug 2005 09:52:46 +0100
To : DS(at)Softimage.COM
From : Tony Quinsee-Jover <tony(at)hdheaven.co.uk>
Subject : Re: Varicam or HD
Define "Better"

In the below example the 1920 image will give SIX TIMES the horizontal resolution of the 300x300 image, but each pixel will only have half the chrominance resolution. 6 x 0.5 = 3, so the 1920 image will still have THREE TIMES the chrominance resolution of the 300x300 image.

Regards,
Tone :)


At 01:38 02/08/2005, you wrote:
a 300x300 4:4:4 image is not better than a 1920x1080 4:2:2 image.
But the individual pixels of the 300x300 have more color information EACH than the later image. And you would get a better key from the 300x300 image.

--- Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: subscribe ds Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe ds


Search the Digital Studio List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.