Thanks Graham,
This is just what I needed to hear. How is the quality coming right out of
the 1700? Our client will like this idea much better than a Varicam to
HDCam via Teranex session.
KEN
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 01:00:34 -0700, gvision wrote
> HI Ken the way we do it is to take the 720 camera tapes with the
> flags using the 1700 Deck we play out to 1080 24 into DS. The deck
> will remove the unwanted frames and play only the 24 flagged frames
> and convert the timecode to 24 frame.
>
> This way you don't have to lay back to 720/24 introducing pulldown. The
> Flagged camera tapes have a form of pulldown but the flags make the removal
> of the 24 discreet frames more accurate with no artefacts. Master
> out to D5 preferably or HDCAM SR or HDcam if you must. Finally you
> could export Tiff TGA or SGI files to disk for the shoot out to film
> check with your film house what they prefer. Our crowd down here
> don't like the Cineon files because they introduce a standard cineon
> LUT which cannot be edit by there system. They prefer doing the
> linear to log conversion using there own LUT.
>
> I hope this makes sense.
>
> Graham
>
> Gvision S.A.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "kennitris" <kennitris(at)glueedit.com>
> To: <DS(at)Softimage.COM>; <DS(at)Softimage.COM>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 11:14 AM
> Subject: Re: Varicam to Film workflow
>
> > I'm more concerned with the 24p vs 59.94 aspect of this. Varicam seems
to
> > be very artifacty with pulldown added.
> >
> > KEN
> >
> > On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 14:17:26 -0400, Jef Huey wrote
> > > Remeber, when you go from 720 to 1080 you are scaling /
> > > interpolating. Making up information. Will doing this actually
> > > help you making a film print? I don't know.
> > >
> > > Jef
> > >
> > > kennitris wrote:
> > >
> > > >Client has shot with Varicam at 720 24p. Offline is on MC at 29.97.
> > Mostly
> > > >cuts and dissolves. Final output is Film out and Television. What are
> > the
> > > >pros and cons of these 2 workflows...
> > > >
> > > >A) Conform Varicam in Nitris at 720 59.94. Output to tape and
convert
> > > >finished tape to D5 (or HDCAM) 1080 24p to remove pulldown for film
> out.
> > > >
> > > >B) Transfer all footage to HDCAM 1080 24p, and conform in Nitris in a
> > 1080
> > > >24p project.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Obviously, plan B adds a bit more cost, but does this workflow make
for
> a
> > > >better film print?
> > > >
> > > >TIA
> > > >
> > > >KEN
> > > >
> > > >---
> > > >Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
> > body: subscribe ds
> > > >Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
> > body: unsubscribe ds
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > ---
> > > Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
> > > body: subscribe ds Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with
> > > the following text in body: unsubscribe ds
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body:
> subscribe ds
> > Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
> body: unsubscribe ds
> >
>
> ---
> Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
> body: subscribe ds Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with
> the following text in body: unsubscribe ds
---
Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: subscribe ds
Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe ds