Re: Varicam to Film workflow

Date : Tue, 2 Aug 2005 19:24:11 -0400
To : DS(at)Softimage.COM, <DS(at)Softimage.COM>
From : "kennitris" <kennitris(at)glueedit.com>
Subject : Re: Varicam to Film workflow
Thanks Graham,

This is just what I needed to hear.  How is the quality coming right out of 
the 1700?  Our client will like this idea much better than a Varicam to 
HDCam via Teranex session.

KEN
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005 01:00:34 -0700, gvision wrote
> HI Ken the way we do it is to take the 720 camera tapes with the 
> flags using the 1700 Deck we play out to 1080 24 into DS. The deck 
> will remove the unwanted frames and play only the 24 flagged frames 
> and convert the timecode to 24 frame.
> 
> This way you don't have to lay back to 720/24 introducing pulldown. The
> Flagged camera tapes have a form of pulldown but the flags make the removal
> of the 24 discreet frames more accurate with no artefacts. Master 
> out to D5 preferably or HDCAM SR or HDcam if you must. Finally you 
> could export Tiff TGA or SGI files to disk for the shoot out to film 
> check with your film house what they prefer. Our crowd down here 
> don't like the Cineon files because they introduce a standard cineon 
> LUT which cannot be edit by there system. They prefer doing the 
> linear to log conversion using there own LUT.
> 
> I hope this makes sense.
> 
> Graham
> 
> Gvision S.A.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "kennitris" <kennitris(at)glueedit.com>
> To: <DS(at)Softimage.COM>; <DS(at)Softimage.COM>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 11:14 AM
> Subject: Re: Varicam to Film workflow
> 
> > I'm more concerned with the 24p vs 59.94 aspect of this.  Varicam seems 
to
> > be very artifacty with pulldown added.
> >
> > KEN
> >
> > On Mon, 01 Aug 2005 14:17:26 -0400, Jef Huey wrote
> > > Remeber,  when you go from 720 to 1080 you are scaling /
> > > interpolating.  Making up information.  Will doing this actually
> > > help you  making a film print?  I don't know.
> > >
> > > Jef
> > >
> > > kennitris wrote:
> > >
> > > >Client has shot with Varicam at 720 24p.  Offline is on MC at 29.97.
> > Mostly
> > > >cuts and dissolves. Final output is Film out and Television.  What are
> > the
> > > >pros and cons of these 2 workflows...
> > > >
> > > >A)  Conform Varicam in Nitris at 720 59.94.  Output to tape and 
convert
> > > >finished tape to D5 (or HDCAM) 1080 24p to remove pulldown for film
> out.
> > > >
> > > >B)  Transfer all footage to HDCAM 1080 24p, and conform in Nitris in a
> > 1080
> > > >24p project.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >Obviously, plan B adds a bit more cost, but does this workflow make 
for
> a
> > > >better film print?
> > > >
> > > >TIA
> > > >
> > > >KEN
> > > >
> > > >---
> > > >Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
> > body: subscribe ds
> > > >Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
> > body: unsubscribe ds
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > ---
> > > Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
> > > body: subscribe ds Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with
> > > the following text in body: unsubscribe ds
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in 
body:
> subscribe ds
> > Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
> body: unsubscribe ds
> >
> 
> ---
> Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in 
> body: subscribe ds Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with 
> the following text in body: unsubscribe ds




---
Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: subscribe ds
Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe ds


Search the Digital Studio List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.