|
You sure she didn't just have a pixelated forhead?
Apparently the most expensive scene in the whole of Miss Congeniality was
where she was walking by the side of a pool, chatting. Why
expensive? Because Ms Bullock had a huge zit on her forehead that
had to be painted out.
What did you do today darling?
I painted out a zit on Sandra Bullock's face.
Oh, nice.
Seeya,
Tone :)
At 14:19 03/08/2005, you wrote:
We aren't talking 4 pixel hits
with the f27 boyo....
The entire forehead of a lead actress turned into a flat wash that
jiggles and shakes as the compression does it's dirty deed
Think AVR3 perhaps
My grannie would spot that even thorough catracts
But as to the question on the table.... i think they feed them to much
coffee
Ta,
d.
On Aug 3, 2005, at 2:02 AM, Tony Quinsee-Jover wrote:
Hi all,
Here's something I've often wondered about. How do these QC houses
get to actually spot the one 4 pixel block of digital dropout on a single
frame in a 1 hour documentary? Or the compression artifacts that
can 'just' be seen one one particular shot?
Do they have incredibly sharpened visual perception, or is there some
software that does this for them?
Cheers,
Tone :)
At 03:16 03/08/2005, Dermot wrote:
The other caveat is
compression artifacting can be exceptionally brutal when you start
colortiming the footage if the camera has been set up to record the
widest dynamic range possible
I would certainly endorse
Graham's workflow, and would use it again if i was to ever work with the
f27 again... but as the images are such unmitigated crap i would rather
be the one drinking a cold one at the beach than the one fighting through
damage control with 1000's of rejection notes from a QC house due
to compression artifacting......
</blockquote></x-html>
|
