We have a Quantel EQ in house and NITRIS downconverts look MUCH
better. EQ is very soft. NITRIS looks, in my opinion, a little
better than the HDcam one, just from looking - when I get the time I
want to do a split screen . . . .
On 8/4/05, Ed Fraticelli <edfrat(at)pmidigital.com> wrote:
> Hi folks;
>
> Concerning a NON-NITRIS (Equinox-based) DS-HD System:
>
> I have noticed how poor my downconversions are (1080i to SD at 29.9
> frames) when done within DS, compared to the same video downconverted by
> the F500 VTR. I have noticed lots of artifacts around fine/sharp
> horizontal details. I guess you'd call them interlace artifacts, but
> there is no interlacing conversion happening here.
>
> The converter in the F500 seems to handle this better, with MUCH less
> artifacts noticed. Is there some setting within DS that can be changed
> to minimize this? Does the Nitris hardware handle downconversions
> better?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ed at PMI
> Pittsburgh, PA
> USA
>
>
>
> ---
> Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: subscribe ds
> Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe ds
>
---
Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: subscribe ds
Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe ds
