RE: 16x9 reformatting in DS- my xpress Pro does it better!

Date : Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:35:08 -0600
To : <DS(at)Softimage.COM>
From : "Murphy, Paul " <Paul.Murphy(at)fotf.org>
Subject : RE: 16x9 reformatting in DS- my xpress Pro does it better!
Hi Dan,

The settings best for down-scaling are in order (lowest to highest) -
Filtered, Pixel Summing Bilinear, & Pixel Summing Bicubic. 

To increase sharpness as you scale up always use Bicubic.

Murf (I read the manual ;-))

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf
Of Dan Rubottom
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 11:15 AM
To: DS(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: 16x9 reformatting in DS- my xpress Pro does it better!

Why can't I seem to get the DS DVE to give me a really sharp and clean
image when I want to reformat it for 16:9?  I've never got a decent
result with this over the last few years and wondering if I'm missing
something.
When I have Squeezed/Anamorphic, native 16:9 footage that I need to
reformat for 4:3 as either letterbox or full screen, the result is
always soft for me.  If I use the "reformat" effect in either Xpress Pro
or Adrenaline, the image is far superior.
Please tell me I'm doing something wrong...

Yes, I've tried all the quality settings, and tried different x, y
values, still no good.

for letterboxing, I use x=100, y=75, bilinear. For  going the other way
from 4:3 to 16:9, x=100, y=125.
Thanks for any help!
::)
Dan


---
Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body: subscribe ds Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the
following text in body: unsubscribe ds

---
Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: subscribe ds
Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe ds


Search the Digital Studio List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.