So... 1080i is interlaced, right?
Even in the US ;-)
Cheers,
Tone :)
> FCC specifications for DTV are pretty straightforward - "today" ....
>
>
>
> Format
>
> Vertical
> Scan Lines
>
> Horizontal Pixels
>
> Aspect Ratio
>
> Scan Mode
>
> Frame Rate (fps)
> H
> D
> T
> V
>
> 1080p
>
> 1080
>
> 1920
>
> 16:9
>
> Progressive
>
> 24
> 1080p
>
> 1080
>
> 1920
>
> 16:9
>
> Progressive
>
> 30
> 1080i
>
> 1080
>
> 1920
>
> 16:9
>
> Interlaced
>
> 30
> 720p
>
> 720
>
> 1280
>
> 16:9
>
> Progressive
>
> 24
> 720p
>
> 720
>
> 1280
>
> 16:9
>
> Progressive
>
> 30
> 720p
>
> 720
>
> 1280
>
> 16:9
>
> Progressive
>
> 60
> E
> D
> T
> V
>
> 480p
>
> 480
>
> 704
>
> 16:9
>
> Progressive
>
> 24
> 480p
>
> 480
>
> 704
>
> 16:9
>
> Progressive
>
> 30
> 480p
>
> 480
>
> 704
>
> 16:9
>
> Progressive
>
> 60
> 480p
>
> 480
>
> 704
>
> 4:3
>
> Progressive
>
> 24
> 480p
>
> 480
>
> 704
>
> 4:3
>
> Progressive
>
> 30
> 480p
>
> 480
>
> 704
>
> 4:3
>
> Progressive
>
> 60
> 480p
>
> 480
>
> 640
>
> 4:3
>
> Progressive
>
> 24
> 480p
>
> 480
>
> 640
>
> 4:3
>
> Progressive
>
> 30
> 480p
>
> 480
>
> 640
>
> 4:3
>
> Progressive
>
> 60
> SDTV
>
> 480i
>
> 480
>
> 704
>
> 16:9
>
> Interlaced
>
> 30
> 480i
>
> 480
>
> 704
>
> 4:3
>
> Interlaced
>
> 30
> 480i
>
> 480
>
> 640
>
> 4:3
>
> Interlaced
>
> 30
>
>
> Acquisition formats... now that is a different matter!
>
> Tom Edwards
> MTV Networks
>
> Marc Fisher wrote:
>
>>I'd have to agree with Rich on this one Matt, if you specify the "i" in
>> you
>>format, it does mean interlaced. 1080psf, would mean 23.98, not 24. And
>>23.98/ HDV is not what messes up the format.720p does not necessarily
>> mean
>>60 progressive anymore, there's 720 23.98 which is making a lot of noise.
>>What it comes down to, at least in the US, is that the darn FCC couldn't,
>> or
>>wouldn't settle on a format, so now formats are running amok. I
>> appreciate
>>Mark Cuban/ HDNet's standard practice.
>>
>>What messes up the format is that most productions don't realize the
>>differences and what they're really better at. If the Prod coordinator
>> would
>>just talk to the online/post facility before they go to edit, then there
>>would be less issues to deal with.
>>
>>And for those who have been editing on MC for yrs and yrs, they need to
>>actually be told there is a difference when setting up a project in MC,
>> that
>>no, 24 does not mean the same as 23.98. They've been so used to selecting
>> 24
>>all these yrs, and never realizing it was 23.98, that it's actually a
>> shock
>>to some when you explain it.
>>
>>Try explaining that to a post super/ editor who has gone all the way thru
>>editing without consulting an Online guy first. Or having 24p material
>>transfer to 59.94 instead of 23.98, and then doing your conform.
>>
>>Don't get me wrong, I like making money, and the ore screw up=the more
>> money
>>you make (Freelance), but I hate "stupid" work. And all it would take is
>> a
>>20 minute conversation b4 telecine to make sure frame rates where at the
>>best and carried thru the entire edit/online/mix stages.
>>
>>But now I'm just rambling.
>>
>>Marc
>>
>>
>>---
>>Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
>> body: subscribe ds
>>Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
>> body: unsubscribe ds
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
---
Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: subscribe ds
Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe ds
