RE: [BULK] - RE: uncontaining containers
| Date : Fri, 2 Sep 2005 12:32:25 -0400 |
| To : <DS(at)Softimage.COM> |
| From : "Hickey, Sean" <Sean_Hickey(at)wpbt.org> |
| Subject : RE: [BULK] - RE: uncontaining containers |
|
It’s a shame. The editor still carries a hefty price tag and to lose such an essential feature is frustrating. I get jealous when I hear you guys talking about working with nodes and trees, features that the editor is also lacking. Now I have to convince my boss to upgrade. Serenity now Sean DS Editor, WPBT Miami. FL
-----Original Message-----
Agreed. The unpublished purpose of the DS Editor was to get people onto the DS platform at a low price, let them realize what they’re missing, and upgrade to the full version. The unintended effect of that was to sour people on the product and – if they aren’t already – on Avid in general.
____________________________ John Heiser Avid DS Editor o2ideas Birmingham, Alabama, USA From:
owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Tony Quinsee-Jover
Well
Sean.... I guess that's why they call it the Editor.... and why they don't sell
very many of them... Hey Guys |
| DATE: | << | >> | THREAD: | << | >> | INDEX: | Main | Thread |
|---|
- Previous by Date: Re: Downconvert Question
- Next by Date: Re: Downconvert Question
- Previous by Thread: Re: Downconvert Question
- Next by Thread: Re: Downconvert Question
- Index(es):
| Search the Digital Studio List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available. |