Good stuff to know, thanks!
JUDY
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of John Heiser
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 1:11 PM
To: DS(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: RE: 16x9 SD
Take it as "Heiser shooting off a poorly-thought-out reply to the list."
I had left out the whole "scale to fit" part.
I've just spent five minutes playing around with various images and
finally got the import to work making a 960x540 square-pixel image in
Photoshop and capturing it into a SD 16:9 sequence with "square
pixels-scale to fit." It worked but was a little soft.
So I resized that image to 720x540 (making it anamorphic) and captured
it again. The type looked much cleaner. So I stick with my previous
posting: create in square pixels at 16:9, resize image to 720 wide,
capture with Scale to Fit and Square Pixels.
____________________________
John Heiser
Avid DS Editor
o2ideas
Birmingham, Alabama, USA
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf
Of Murphy, Paul
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 12:19 PM
To: DS(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: RE: 16x9 SD
Hi John,
Not sure how to take that...
Murf
---
Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: subscribe ds
Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe ds
---
Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: subscribe ds
Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe ds
