Re: Workflow Question

Date : Sat, 1 Oct 2005 15:12:49 -0500
To : DS(at)Softimage.COM
From : Chris Smith <chris(at)sugarfilmproduction.com>
Subject : Re: Workflow Question
Good advice.  I prefer trees by a long shot, but if the effect started out simple, instead of having a tree with one or two nodes I tend to want to just do a clip effect.  But of course there is always that one more thing it needs then you've outgrown your effects stack.

Do you just always make a clip a composite container and do trees regardless even if it's a node or two?  Or do you make an alternate Edit layout like Tony suggested to do your trees and do your trees in the 'effect tree' clip effect?


Chris Smith

Partner/Film Director

Sugar Film Production

3699 McKinney #222

Dallas 75204

214.655.2662

Received: from softgate1.softimage.com (SoftGate1.Softimage.COM [198.168.8.130]) by zeus.itg.uiuc.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j91KGgNb006252 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits%6 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 15:16:43 -0500 Received: from paperboy.global.avidww.com (IDENT:U2FsdGVkX19zclvtXVYDKnsMoDSduzFa6Fwl0/LshxI(at)localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by softgate1.softimage.com (8.12.11/8.12.1) with ESMTP id j91J6aPM013397; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 15:06:36 -0400 Received: from paperboy.global.avidww.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by paperboy.global.avidww.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j91KF9vQ007140; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 16:15:09 -0400 Received: (from majordom(at)localhost) by paperboy.global.avidww.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id j91KF93f007139; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 16:15:09 -0400 X-Authentication-Warning: paperboy.global.avidww.com: majordom set sender to owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM using -f Received: from mtl-smtpgw2.global.avidww.com (mtl-smtpgw2.global.avidww.com [172.24.33.104]) by paperboy.global.avidww.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j91KF8vQ007136 for ; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 16:15:08 -0400 Received: from softgate1.softimage.com ([172.24.33.30]) by mtl-smtpgw2.global.avidww.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Sat, 1 Oct 2005 16:14:58 -0400 Received: from host4.dnns.net (IDENT:U2FsdGVkX1/0BJH2ZM50jjmjF1gItjlzt/l/gmW1utw(at)localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by softgate1.softimage.com (8.12.11/8.12.1) with SMTP id j91J6WJS013377 for ; Sat, 1 Oct 2005 15:06:33 -0400 Received: from 58.90.425e.cidr.airmail.net ([66.94.144.88] helo=[10.0.1.2]) by host4.dnns.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.52) id 1ELnl2-0003eE-7P for DS(at)Softimage.COM; Sat, 01 Oct 2005 16:14:56 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v733) In-Reply-To: <009801c5c696$b85e50b0$6718cfd9(at)Medion> References: <009801c5c696$b85e50b0$6718cfd9(at)Medion> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-3--433350079 Message-Id: <2FDB3B5E-744A-424B-8DAA-CFBFF87124F1(at)sugarfilmproduction.com> From: Chris Smith Subject: Re: Workflow Question Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2005 15:15:05 -0500 To: DS(at)Softimage.COM X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.733) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host4.dnns.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - softimage.com X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [0 0] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - sugarfilmproduction.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Oct 2005 20:14:58.0912 (UTC) FILETIME=[CC0B7600:01C5C6C4] Sender: owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM Precedence: bulk Reply-To: DS(at)Softimage.COM X-Loop: ds(at)Softimage.COM --Apple-Mail-3--433350079 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Interesting. My question is though would that work? Because if you double click the 'effects tree' clip effect you get the blank page with the expand button in a parameter editor. But once you click expand, the tree opens in a float viewer. I'm not at DS right now. Could you just hit the lock button and the tree will open into the same embedded window? Chris Smith Partner/Film Director Sugar Film Production 3699 McKinney #222 Dallas 75204 214.655.2662 http://www.sugarfilmproduction.com On Oct 1, 2005, at 9:45 AM, Tony Quinsee-Jover wrote: > Hi Chris, > > My not just make a new editing layout that replicates your > compositing layout? > > Regards, > Tone :) > > > From: owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM] On > Behalf Of Chris Smith > Sent: 01 October 2005 15:11 > To: ds(at)Softimage.COM > Subject: Workflow Question > > reminder: noob in training. > > It seems that when I start to do effects with a clip I just go for > a clip effect added in the top timeline. But as soon as I have more > than 3 or 4 effects or need to pipe things in multiple branches, it > becomes clear it should live as an effects tree. Well, obviously > there is the right-clickable option to 'convert to effects tree', > however now it is one clip effect. So to modify it, you have to > click on that effect, then hit the expand button, then have a > floating window covering your workspace. Then I made my own user > toolbar with all the effects I want in a specific order which I > built in to the main 'compositing' timeline. So now I have to open > it as a separate floater. Then when I actually change a node, a > parameter editor has to pop as a floater. So now I'm basically in > what should be my compositing mode but with all these windows > floating over my editing mode. > > Like many of you, I re-did the 'compositing' layout to work > beautifully for what I need (I simulated Shake for mine). So it > seems ridiculous that I should be doing my effects tree work on the > top timeline in floating windows. > > So the question is: Is there a way to take a clip with effects and > with one function, turn the clip into a composite container AND > convert the effects to an effects tree piped into that layer within > the 'composite' layout? So you basically can just jump over to > composite mode and have your effects rebuild into a tree in that mode. > > Right now I am collapsing the effects into a effects tree on the > timeline. Then turning the clip into a composite container. Then > opening said effects tree. lassoing all the nodes. Hitting COPY. > Then pasting them into the layer's effect tree in the composite > layout. Kind of a hassle. > > Chris Smith > Partner/Film Director > Sugar Film Production > 3699 McKinney #222 > Dallas 75204 > 214.655.2662 > http://www.sugarfilmproduction.com > --Apple-Mail-3--433350079 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Interesting.  My question is though would that work?  Because if you double click the 'effects tree' clip effect you get the blank page with the expand button in a parameter editor.  But once you click expand, the tree opens in a float viewer.  


I'm not at DS right now.  Could you just hit the lock button and the tree will open into the same embedded window?


Chris Smith

Partner/Film Director

Sugar Film Production

3699 McKinney #222

Dallas 75204

214.655.2662

http://www.sugarfilmproduction.com


On Oct 1, 2005, at 9:45 AM, Tony Quinsee-Jover wrote:

Hi Chris,

On Oct 1, 2005, at 10:05 AM, Michael Jensen wrote:

Chris,

 

I think you have already found the easiest way to do what you want to do.  I personally almost always work with tree effects to begin with because it is easier to rearrange, bypass and visualize your effect overall.

 

Michael

 


From: owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Chris Smith
Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 9:11 AM
To: ds(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: Workflow Question

 

reminder: noob in training.

 

 

My not just make a new editing layout that replicates your compositing layout?
 
Regards,
Tone :)
 


From: owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Chris Smith
Sent: 01 October 2005 15:11
To: ds(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: Workflow Question

reminder: noob in training.

It seems that when I start to do effects with a clip I just go for a clip effect added in the top timeline. But as soon as I have more than 3 or 4 effects or need to pipe things in multiple branches, it becomes clear it should live as an effects tree. Well, obviously there is the right-clickable option to 'convert to effects tree', however now it is one clip effect. So to modify it, you have to click on that effect, then hit the expand button, then have a floating window covering your workspace. Then I made my own user toolbar with all the effects I want in a specific order which I built in to the main 'compositing' timeline. So now I have to open it as a separate floater. Then when I actually change a node, a parameter editor has to pop as a floater. So now I'm basically in what should be my compositing mode but with all these windows floating over my editing mode.

Like many of you, I re-did the 'compositing' layout to work beautifully for what I need (I simulated Shake for mine). So it seems ridiculous that I should be doing my effects tree work on the top timeline in floating windows.

So the question is: Is there a way to take a clip with effects and with one function, turn the clip into a composite container AND convert the effects to an effects tree piped into that layer within the 'composite' layout? So you basically can just jump over to composite mode and have your effects rebuild into a tree in that mode.

Right now I am collapsing the effects into a effects tree on the timeline. Then turning the clip into a composite container. Then opening said effects tree. lassoing all the nodes. Hitting COPY. Then pasting them into the layer's effect tree in the composite layout. Kind of a hassle.

Chris Smith
Partner/Film Director
Sugar Film Production
3699 McKinney #222
Dallas 75204
214.655.2662


--Apple-Mail-3--433350079-- --- Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: subscribe ds Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe ds px; ">It seems that when I start to do effects with a clip I just go for a clip effect added in the top timeline. But as soon as I have more than 3 or 4 effects or need to pipe things in multiple branches, it becomes clear it should live as an effects tree. Well, obviously there is the right-clickable option to 'convert to effects tree', however now it is one clip effect. So to modify it, you have to click on that effect, then hit the expand button, then have a floating window covering your workspace. Then I made my own user toolbar with all the effects I want in a specific order which I built in to the main 'compositing' timeline. So now I have to open it as a separate floater. Then when I actually change a node, a parameter editor has to pop as a floater. So now I'm basically in what should be my compositing mode but with all these windows floating over my editing mode.

 

Like many of you, I re-did the 'compositing' layout to work beautifully for what I need (I simulated Shake for mine). So it seems ridiculous that I should be doing my effects tree work on the top timeline in floating windows.

 

So the question is: Is there a way to take a clip with effects and with one function, turn the clip into a composite container AND convert the effects to an effects tree piped into that layer within the 'composite' layout? So you basically can just jump over to composite mode and have your effects rebuild into a tree in that mode.

 

Right now I am collapsing the effects into a effects tree on the timeline. Then turning the clip into a composite container. Then opening said effects tree. lassoing all the nodes. Hitting COPY. Then pasting them into the layer's effect tree in the composite layout. Kind of a hassle.

 

Chris Smith
Partner/Film Director
Sugar Film Production
3699 McKinney #222
Dallas 75204
214.655.2662

 




Search the Digital Studio List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.