Re: DS and FCP

Date : Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:30:32 +0000
To : DS(at)Softimage.COM
From : paulingvarsson(at)mac.com
Subject : Re: DS and FCP
Hi Phil,

I recently bought an HD capable FCP system out of curiosity, mainly due to my worries about DS and Avid in general. I was very surprised to be asked about the availability of the system almost immediately. I've already more than covered the cost of the purchase plus I now know how to use FCP efficiently (but not as comfortably as I would use DS or MC Symphony etc).

I don't know how MC proficient you are now but I would recommend a book called 'FCP for Avid Editors' by Diana Weynand if you're thinking of going down that road.

FCP is a beast not to be ignored - attach the right hardware (eg scope/monitors/speakers) and it stands very well - I enjoy editing on it it feels very natural. You cannot expect to do everything within FCP. Shake for effects and compositing, Motion and After Effects for graphics etc.

FCP 5 now has a feature called 'round tripping' - eg you select a bunch of clips on your timeline, right click and say - 'send to shake', you then make your comp in shake, save, then switch to FCP - your clips have now the appearance of one clip (just like a composite container) that you can render within FCP. The best bit is that you can then select this clip and choose to modify the contents within shake. This to me is virtually exactly like the way Ds deals with composite containers. This round tripping works with Motion too. Apparently due to limitations of XML that is doing the leg work behind the scenes freeze frames and speed effects get screwed up - this can be sorted by replacing the speed clip with a rendered version of itself without the speed settings.

FCP is not a realtime system. In Avid land we all expect realtime to mean 'at the quality to lay back to tape' - in FCP realtime means it drops resolution and frames to maintain realtime playback. This can be advantageous if you are working on a multilayered seq to get the jist of the timings of your layers. You might get one layer of '3 way colour correction' without many adjustments to play back at full res.

This brings me onto colour correction. FCP fanatics will tell you that you can do everything with about 8 different plugins - but I find it painful to work like that. But you can get good results, especially when referring to a proper scope etc. I am looking with particular interest at a product called Final Touch HD from www.siliconcolor.com (this works with FCP using XML therefore suffers the same limitations) this looks great but although it says 'realtime' it is only for preview - you still have to render 'new' media for FCP to link to. It works totally in 32bit and supports control surfaces for colour correction which does interest me - i've never used these as I've always graded with curves on Symphony or DS.

I'm really pleased that I spent the time and cash on FCP - i'm not totally confident on it yet but for the jobs that I do it could be perfect and i'm looking at this Final Touch and a Mackie MCU for mixing audio.

One major downside at the moment is that the world of FCP seems to be full of amateur grade thinking and client responsibility. I've already had to hire someone else's kit and then that person as an editor for a job that I couldn't cover. I did this with the understanding that my kit would always have priority and the client was my client. Sure enough 2 weeks later I hear that that person had undercut me and my kit - something I had discussed with them and was assured would not happen. Maybe this is just harsh business but i couldn't imagine this happening in the Avid world where trust, reputation and relationships gets you far.

Hope this helps, sure i'll bump into you soon. PS FCP editor freelance rates seem to be almost half that of DS :(

Paul



On 31 Oct 2005, at 17:33, phil gadd wrote:

Has anyway had any experience in using FCP?


www.philgadd-dseditor.tv phil(at)philgadd-dseditor.tv




-----Original Message----- From: owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of John Heiser Sent: 31 October 2005 17:27 To: DS(at)Softimage.COM Subject: RE: DS and FCP

Agreed, Wes, and thanks for the clarification. Though I tried to gently
pin the blame on DS, I should have also restated your product's
reputation as a fine tool for passing projects around from app to app. I
think everybody knows this sort of situation is not the fault of
Automatic Duck.


____________________________
John Heiser
Avid DS Editor
o2ideas
Birmingham, Alabama, USA

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf
Of Wes Plate
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 11:00 AM
To: DS(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: RE: DS and FCP


On Mon Oct 31 7:55 , 'John Heiser' <johnh(at)o2ideas.com> sent:

But a very experienced editor sent me an FCP>Duck OMF last year which
was,
in every sense, awful.

DS definitely has OMF import problems, this is why our web site specifically singles out DS as unsupported. We are hopeful that eventually DS might adopt standardized AAF 1.1 import, especially Edit Protocol, and maybe then things will improve.


--

Wes Plate
Automatic Duck, Inc.
http://www.automaticduck.com



---
Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body: subscribe ds
Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body: unsubscribe ds

---
Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body: subscribe ds
Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body: unsubscribe ds
---
Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: subscribe ds
Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe ds



Paul Ingvarsson
Freelance Editor
Avid DS / Avid Symphony
+44 (0) 7768 016948

---
Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: subscribe ds
Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe ds

  • Follow-Ups:
  • References:

Search the Digital Studio List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.