RE: 23.98

["Peter Zacaroli" <dslist(at)westdigital.co.uk>]

Thanks for the replies guys.

 

Peter

 

---

From: owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Bogdan Grigorescu
Sent: 24 November 2005 15:57
To: DS(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: Re: 23.98

 

Hi Peter,

Both workflows are viable, as long as you can have consistent cadence at the 3:2 pulldown stage. In our experience, the J-H3 deck is able to keep up only in a playback only scenario. In a batch capture situation, the  hit/miss ratio  was  around 50-60%, meaning some clips  are captured properly, whereas others are  not(they come in with wrong cadence). Changing the deck to an HDW-F500 increased the success rate to 95%.
My advice is to dub the HD tape to  an SD format(Digi, BetaSP,  DVCAM, DVCPRO),  keep TC as NDF and go from there. If you go DVCAM/DVCPRO, hire a good editing deck(like DSR1800) if you want to avoid similar issues.

Bogdan Grigoresco, BSEE

Sr. Broadcast Engineer

Finalé Editworks, Vancouver

 

Peter Zacaroli <dslist(at)westdigital.co.uk> wrote:

Hi everyone,

I've got a question regarding 29.98, being English I don't know very much
about NTSC so please be gently with me.

How do you handle 23.98 in post? We've got a client who's shot 23.98 and
needs to offline on media composer. So far the two routes that have been
suggested are:-

Offline on Film Composer at 24 fps using a JH3 to put out the correct
timecode.

Make offline copies in NTSC at 29.97 and then edit on Media composer

As you can probably tell I'm rather vague on detail but if anyone can help
I'd be really grateful.

Peter


---
Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: subscribe ds
Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordommo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe ds

 

---

Yahoo! Music Unlimited - Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.