RE: If not DS...

Date : Mon, 28 Nov 2005 15:20:00 -0700
To : <DS(at)Softimage.COM>
From : "Chasteen, Howard" <Howard.Chasteen(at)fotf.org>
Subject : RE: If not DS...
So true. One thing we liked was the "open" PC platform versus Mac
specific. Okay everyone lets don't go chasing Apple/rabbits now;-)

H 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf
Of Andi Loor
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2005 2:33 PM
To: DS(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: Re: If not DS...

Hi Howard,
when Digital Studio was put to market there was a lot of talk about the 
processors taking care of all the work and the platform beeing 
upgradeable - not hardware based. I really never understood the greatnes

of that for me as a consumer because I can't see that this has made the 
system any cheaper to upgrade. And now we're back to hardware anyway....
Andi


Chasteen, Howard wrote:

>  while others systems were constantly having to buy new hardware, did 
> not come with sufficient tools, etc.
>

-- 
Andi Loor
www.andiloor.se

---
Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body: subscribe ds
Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body: unsubscribe ds

---
Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: subscribe ds
Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe ds


Search the Digital Studio List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.