|
Ahhh yes. I remember the name clearly, but crossed up the man's
title. I blame it on 4 months of my life this year with very little
sleep. :0
td
On 11/30/05, tony(at)hdheaven.co.uk <tony(at)hdheaven.co.uk> wrote:
Hi Tim,
You're only wrong in that it was the Head of Development, not the Product
Manager.
Kind of a bitch when you're fighting the corner for someone who doesn't
back you up...
Regards,
Tony
> Well -- I witnessed our dear product manager being a HUGE WEANIE in front
> of
> Tone and David Krall. David asked "Do you have all the resources you
> need?" And the product manager said, "Why yes, yes! We have everything we
> need, Mr. Krall." That's the moment I gave up on Avid.
>
> td
>
> P.S. -- Tone correct me if my memory has wavered.
>
>
> On 11/29/05, Chris Smith <chris(at)sugarfilmproduction.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > No more than 2 developers working does not worry you?
>>
>> I was not aware of this. Thanks for that. I suppose it could be
>> rationalized that they used the others to get Symp out the door. I'm
>> certainly not defending Avid since I know nothing about the company.
>> Our new DS is the first Avid product I've ever used. But from a newb
>> perspective I see a lot of anger/disappointment without seeing some
>> facts. I only take a stance when I have proof and was looking for
>> some evidence.
>>
>> Yes, 2 developers is not a good sign. But I'd like to believe the
>> simplest theory though is not dissolution of the product but a "hitch
>> in the get-a-long".
>>
>> My main concern is not seeing DS leave, but Larry's point that the
>> rate of features needed are quickly outgrowing the development.
>>
>> >
>> > --
>> > _______________________________________
>> > Knut A. Helgeland
|
