RE: DNxHD downconverts

Date : Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:38:50 -0000
To : "DS Mailing List" <DS(at)Softimage.COM>
From : <pat-list(at)horridge.demon.co.uk>
Subject : RE: DNxHD downconverts
 Suspect it because we're more fussy in PAL land ;-)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Quinsee-Jover [mailto:tony(at)hdheaven.co.uk] 
> Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 3:17 PM
> Subject: RE: DNxHD downconverts
> 
> Fwiw, the PAL downconverts are better than the NTSC one - dunno why.
> 
> T :) 
> 
> - -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM] 
> On Behalf Of Rune Holm
> Sent: 15 December 2005 14:55
> To: DS(at)Softimage.COM
> Subject: SV: DNxHD downconverts
> 
> It is a hardware thing so unless they can improve on the 
> quality with a firmware upgrade then we are stuck with a 
> lousy downconverter. If it was an easy fix they should have 
> done it by now.
> 
> Rune
> 
> - -----Oprindelig meddelelse-----
> Fra: owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM]På 
> vegne af Scott Roy
> Sendt: 15. december 2005 15:21
> Til: DS(at)Softimage.COM
> Emne: RE: DNxHD downconverts
> 
> 
> Thanks for everyones support one this topic....I've convinced 
> them to rent the deck for the HD output and the 
> downconversions....Thank goodness!!
> 
> Hopefully in V8 the downconversions will be acceptable...
> 
> //s
>   
> 
> 
> scott roy | editorial
> s e r i o u s  r o b o t s
> www.seriousrobots.com
> 919.645.6650
> 
> - -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM] 
> On Behalf Of Bob Maple
> Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2005 10:37 PM
> To: DS(at)Softimage.COM
> Subject: Re: DNxHD downconverts
> 
> > Bob,
> >
> > Good news, I think......I guess I would need to output an 
> HD avi ref 
> > file(project is 1080PsF 23.976), then create an SD sequence 
> and link 
> > to the HD file??  Then add a 2:3 expand and a DVE to suit??
> 
> Yup.
> 
> > With all this....Is it acceptable at the end of the day??  
> Or pony up 
> > for the HD deck??
> 
> The only thing I'm not actually positive of is if you're incurring a 
> YUV->RGB->YUV conversion because of the reference movie.. 
> which may or 
> YUV->RGB->may
> not be a problem.
> 
> Maybe Sylvain or someone can chime in and confirm/deny 
> whether or not when DS captures it's own reference movies, 
> can it access the raw component data or does the codec always 
> give Windows an RGB frame which DS then has to convert back?
> 
> 
> |  Bob Maple  |  bobm_at_burner_dot_com  |  [http] burner.com
> |
> |  I don't want the world, I just want your half.
> |    - They Might Be Giants
> 
> - ---
> Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
> body: subscribe ds Unsubscribe? E-Mail 
> Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: 
> unsubscribe ds
> 
> - ---
> Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following 
> text in body:
> subscribe ds Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with 
> the following text in body: unsubscribe ds
> 
> - ---
> Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following 
> text in body:
> subscribe ds Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with 
> the following text in body: unsubscribe ds
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> 



---
Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: subscribe ds
Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe ds


Search the Digital Studio List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.