RE: field dominance fun..?
| Date : Wed, 21 Dec 2005 11:33:28 -0500 |
| To : DS(at)Softimage.COM |
| From : AGreenberg(at)chaines.astral.com |
| Subject : RE: field dominance fun..? |
|
I don`t want to start a whole topic on this 2 month old
thread, but for the people who are unsure, the field domininance setting in the
DS does not only refer to which field the edit occurs, but actually the field order. ( In fact, I dont`t even
know if it refers to the video edit at all, but I assume it does ) If you output
to file some interlaced footage and capture with field domininace set to odd
and then capture again set to even, they will not give you the same result. One
has the field order reversed giving an ugly unprofessional result which I am
sure we all have seen somewhere at some time on some tape and thought ``What`s
up with that mess ???`` So although field order and field domininace may be 2
different things, they are the same thing in the DS. In fact with version 7.6,
it seems like you could referse the field order on output, but upon
investigation, it seems importing that with any setting does not give the
correct result. You either get the wrong field order, or you get the correct
field order but a soft result. -----Message d'origine----- The biggest misunderstanding comes from whether you start counting from
0 (like a computer programmer), or 1 (like almost everyone else). Field Dominance is where in time the video edit occurs: either at the timecode given, or 1/50th or 1/59.94th of a second later. Field Order is the spatial position of each field. Upper means that F1
gets the 1st scanline or raster. Lower means it gets the 2nd scanline. Today there's a strong correlation between TV standard and Field Order,
but that didn't used to be the case. I seem to remember NuBus Avids and
Radius Videovision used to be Upper Field, and Intelligent Resources' Video Explorer was Lower Field, both for NTSC. -DaveT On 10/10/05 3:40 PM, "jamie dickinson"
<dickij10(at)hotmail.com> wrote: > > I'm determined to nail this! I'm looking at this; > > http://www.lurkertech.com/lg/dominance.html > ... which is making some of it clearer. > > cheers > >> From: "Ryan Collier"
<rcollier(at)postcentral.com> >> Reply-To: DS(at)Softimage.COM >> To: <DS(at)Softimage.COM> >> Subject: RE: field dominance fun..? >> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 09:51:29 -0400 >> >> Well, I could be 100% wrong -- ha!! >> >> My personal experience with PAL is somewhat limited. >> >> But, this is how I've come to understand it from a variety of
sources. Most >> of which came from the American Cinematographer Video Manual
(a highly >> recommended purchase, along with the Film Manual) as well as
Chris & Trish >> Meyer's Creating Motion with After Effects (also a recommended
purchase). >> >> Both are excellent resources. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Ryan Collier >> Avid|DS Artist >> >> -------------------- >> The Past is Prologue >> -------------------- >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM]
On Behalf Of >> jamie dickinson >> Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 9:27 AM >> To: DS(at)Softimage.COM >> Subject: Re: field dominance fun..? >> >> >> Ryan >> Thanks. I keep thinking I've got it now... but ... I need to
digest this. >> This sometimes seems contradictory to what I thought I knew. I
keep going >> back to the simple scenario of a tube camera, recorded by a
1" tape, played >> to a tube telly. Once you involve computers you can make
anything work by >> storing and reading out frames how you like - but it had to
work in the >> good >> >> old days... >> cheers - Jamie >> >> I knew it would be fun !! >> >>> From: Ryan Collier <rcollier(at)postcentral.com> >>> Reply-To: DS(at)Softimage.COM >>> To: DS(at)Softimage.COM >>> Subject: Re: field dominance fun..? >>> Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2005 12:09:52 -0400 >>> >>> Jamie- >>> >>> --Are you saying that (in PAL) f1 starts scanning top-left
with line 2 >> and >> >>> f2 starts scanning top-middle (the half line at the top)
with line 1? >>> >>> Yes, this is exactly right and describes the "field
order" -- how the >>> fields are laid down on tape. >>> >>> --And f1 is called upper, even though it starts on line 2
and there's a >>> half of line one above it? >>> >>> Yes, as far as I understand it. Remember though, while the
UPPER field >>> (F1) comes first in the FIELD ORDER, the LOWER field (F2)
is displayed >>> first, resulting in the EVEN DOMINANCE. For NTSC it is
opposite. LOWER >>> field (F2) comes first in the FIELD ORDER, but the UPPER
field (F1) is >>> displayed first, resulting in the ODD dominance. >>> >>> The terms "upper/lower" only apply toward FIELD
ORDER. As in, "the upper >>> field is laid to tape first." It might help to think
of it like this: >>> >>> Whereas PAL is UPPER field first, a group of PAL frames
might look >>> something like this on tape: >>> >>> Field 1 Field 2 Field
3 Field 4 >>> F1 F2 |
F1 F2 >>> upper lower
upper lower >>> even scan lines odd scan lines even scan
lines odd scan >> lines >>> >>> >>> Whereas NTSC is LOWER field first, a group of NTSC frames
might look >>> something like this on tape: >>> >>> Field 1 Field 2 Field
3 Field 4 >>> F2 F1 | F2
F1 >>> lower upper
lower upper >>> even scan lines odd scan lines even scan
lines odd scan >> lines >>> >>> The picture is always reconstructed by drawing lines 1, 3,
5, 7, etc. >>> first. And since line 1 of the PAL picture is contained in
F2 (even) DS >>> sets the FIELD DOMINANCE to even for PAL sequences. >>> >>> Sort of like it asking, "Where can I find the 1, 3,
5, 7, etc. scan >> lines >>> of the PAL picture?" And being told, "you can
find those lines in F2, >> the >>> EVEN field, of the PAL picture." And so, the DS
replies, "Thank you, I >>> will set myself to an EVEN DOMINANCE then for PAL
sequences." >>> >>> So, using our question/answer scenario again for NTSC: >>> >>> - "For NTSC, where can I find the 1, 3, 5, 7, etc.
scan lines of the >>> picture?" >>> >>> - "You can find those lines in F1, the ODD field, of
the NTSC picture." >>> >>> - "Thank you, I will set myself to an ODD dominance
then." >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Ryan >>> --- >>> Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the
following text in >> body: >>> subscribe ds >>> Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the
following text in >>> body: unsubscribe ds >> >>
_________________________________________________________________ >> Be the first to hear what's new at MSN - sign up to our free
newsletters! >> http://www.msn.co.uk/newsletters >> >> >> --- >> Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following
text in body: >> subscribe ds >> Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following
text in >> body: >> unsubscribe ds >> >> >> --- >> Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following
text in body: >> subscribe ds >> Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following
text in >> body: unsubscribe ds > > _________________________________________________________________ > The new MSN Search Toolbar now includes Desktop search! > http://toolbar.msn.co.uk/ > > --- > Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text
in body: > subscribe ds > Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following
text in body: > unsubscribe ds --- Subscribe? E-mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body: subscribe ds Unsubscribe? E-Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body: unsubscribe ds AVERTISSEMENT CONCERNANT LA CONFIDENTIALITÉ Le présent message est à l'usage exclusif du ou des destinataires mentionnés ci-dessus. Son contenu est confidentiel et peut être assujetti au secret professionnel. Si vous avez reçu le présent message par erreur, veuillez nous en aviser immédiatement et le détruire en vous abstenant d'en faire une copie, d'en divulguer le contenu ou d'y donner suite. CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This communication is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee identified above. Its content is confidential and may contain privileged information. If you have received this communication by error, please notify the sender and delete the message without copying or disclosing it. |
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: field dominance fun..?
- From: Clive Jenkins <cjenkins(at)postcentral.com>
- Re: field dominance fun..?
| DATE: | << | >> | THREAD: | << | >> | INDEX: | Main | Thread |
|---|
- Previous by Date: Re: Wacky buttons
- Next by Date: Re: Wacky buttons
- Previous by Thread: Re: Wacky buttons
- Next by Thread: Re: Wacky buttons
- Index(es):
| Search the Digital Studio List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available. |