RE: 3:2

Date : Thu, 5 Jan 2006 11:28:34 -0800
To : <DS(at)Softimage.COM>
From : "Tony Cacciarelli" <tonycac(at)2gdigital.com>
Subject : RE: 3:2
Title: Re: 3:2

chris-

 

I have a set procedure for how I remove/re-instate 3:2 pullown so that the clip ends up exactly as it was before.

 

the problem you’re having with clips coming up short has to do with the way DS is re-applying the 3:2.

when you apply 3:2 expand, DS assumes the first frame of your clip is an A-frame.

but, this may not be the case.

to be clear, I’m defining an A-frame based on this sequence:

 

AA BB BC CD DD

 

so, the first frame of the clip should be an AA and the last frame should be a DD [so that the cut happens between the AA and DD]

if every cut in your sequence is a separate clip, you may have to extend the head and tails to get them to an A-frame.

I usually just drag the clip onto a separate track, extend the head/tail to an A-frame, do my 3:2 contract/expand and then plop the clip back into its original spot [or leave it on a separate track to signify that it’s had GFX done to it]

then you step into the expand container, apply whatever GFX etc. you’re gonna do and then step out and render on frames.

 

for the work I do, I have to keep the 3:2 exactly as it was so I *have* to follow this procedure.

I’m sure it’s not essential in many situations and extending the head/tail to make up whatever frames are lost may be OK but I think it’s a good habit to get into.

 

hope that helps.

tony cacciarelli

 

 

 

 

 

 


From: owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Gregory, Ryan
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 10:37 AM
To: ds(at)softimage.com
Subject: Re: 3:2

 

Chris,
I always render Frames too :)

Once you contract, extend the end a couple frames, and that will solve the falling short after expanding.

Hope this helps.
Ryan


On 1/5/06 1:32 PM, "Chris Smith" <chris(at)sugarfilmproduction.com> wrote:

Thanks Ryan,

Still confused though.  Here's my process / observations:

I have a "final edit".  I select a clip.  I add 3:2 contact.  It creates a container. The container is now short in the timeline.  I then immediately add a 3:2 Expand. It lengthens back out, but not to the full length it was.  It comes a few frames short.

If I step in to the container.  I'm at the true 24 (no half frames) footage.  This is good for me.  Except I'm having to hunt down the tiny area I was needing to work on.  Inside the container is the entire master clip.

side note.  I always render in Frames.  I don't like the look of fields rendering on animation and I always want to work with whole frames anyways.  (like when I shoot and transfer at 30fps).

Thanks for any help.

 

Chris Smith


Partner/Film Director


Sugar Film Production


3699 McKinney #222


Dallas 75204


214.655.2662


http://www.sugarfilmproduction.com
 

On Jan 5, 2006, at 12:09 PM, Gregory, Ryan wrote:

Hi Chris,
 When you apply the Contract Container, that becomes 24. If you step in, it will be the 30fps material. After you apply the container that becomes your clip. I usually put a cache on the container and set to frames, render. Then do my work on that, render in frames, then expand and render that in fields.
 
 Remember to park on the first “mixed” frame when you apply the contract.
 Good luck.
 Ryan
 
 
 On 1/5/06 12:55 PM, "Chris Smith" <chris(at)sugarfilmproduction.com> wrote:
 
 

Normally I roll my cameras at 30fps to not deal with pulldown issues.  But I'm doing a cut from a job I shot at 24fps and it's driving me crazy.
 
 Questions about the 3:2 process:
 
 1.  The way I cut is not with subclips but just selects dragged to the timeline.  So when I add the 3:2 contract effect and it creates the container, inside the container the clip seems to be the length of the master clip.  Do I need to always go chase down where my in/out points of the top clip are?  Or am I doing something wrong?  I'd like to have a short clip in an edit, apply a 3:2 contract and inside the container just see the frames from the clip I'm working on.
 
 2.  Is it standard in a 24fps edit to do a 3:2 contract and expand so that the sequence is always the same 3:2 sequence as opposed to a random one based on how it was edited?  Or do you only do a contract/expand on clips that you need to do effects on?
 
  
 
 
Chris Smith
 

 
 
Partner/Film Director
 

 
 
Sugar Film Production
 

 
 
3699 McKinney #222
 

 
 
Dallas 75204
 

 
 
214.655.2662
 

 
 
http://www.sugarfilmproduction.com
 
 
 
 
 


    
This message and any attachments contain information, which may be confidential or privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, please refrain from any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this information.  Please be aware that such actions are prohibited.  If you have received this transmission in error, kindly notify us by calling 1-800-262-4723 or e-mail to helpdesk(at)bbdo.com. We appreciate your cooperation.
 

 

 


Search the Digital Studio List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.