RE: 3:2
| Date : Thu, 5 Jan 2006 12:41:00 -0800 |
| To : <DS(at)Softimage.COM> |
| From : "Tony Cacciarelli" <tonycac(at)2gdigital.com> |
| Subject : RE: 3:2 |
|
I agree. I only use contract/expand on
shots that are affected. however, if you have to deliver a continuous
3:2 master, you would have to deal with each shot separately. this can get pretty ugly on long
sequences. tony cacciarelli
From: owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM
[mailto:owner-ds(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Gregory,
Ryan I only do it for the shots that
need effects. I don’t know if this is the “proper” way, but
it always looks fine and never had any problems. Thanks Guys, On 1/5/06, Chris Smith
<chris(at)sugarfilmproduction.com> wrote:
|
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 3:2
- From: Chris Smith <chris(at)sugarfilmproduction.com>
- Re: 3:2
| DATE: | << | >> | THREAD: | << | >> | INDEX: | Main | Thread |
|---|
- Previous by Date: RE: How long are we prepared to wait for an answer from avid?
- Next by Date: RE: How long are we prepared to wait for an answer from avid?
- Previous by Thread: RE: How long are we prepared to wait for an answer from avid?
- Next by Thread: RE: How long are we prepared to wait for an answer from avid?
- Index(es):
| Search the Digital Studio List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available. |
