Re: a comparisment

Date : Mon, 4 Jul 2005 17:21:53 -0400
To : <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
From : "phil harbath" <phil.harbath(at)jamination.com>
Subject : Re: a comparisment
there must be something wrong with my athlon64 3500+, it doesn't compete with my dual zeon 2.8, it pretty much is on par with a pentium 4 3.0 single. is there some settings you are using to get that kind of performance (i have an asus motherboard).

phil

----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Andersson" <sanders3d(at)gmail.com>
To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
Sent: Monday, July 04, 2005 11:51 AM
Subject: a comparisment



Hello All,

I just did a small test here at the office since we recived a few new
opterons (not dual core though). I though it might be fun for others
to see the results. It was a simple scene with a few shaders on
(dirtmap, diffusion, toon, constant, relection).... simple art by the
humble artist Alexei at xtfx :)

anyhooo... (from the frame that took the longest time to render)

1 x AMD Athlon64 3500+, 1GB Ram             04:29
2 x Intel XEON 3.2 Ghz, 2GB Ram                04:03
2 x AMD Opteron 242, 2GB Ram                  02:11

Interesting also because the XEON were almost 3 times the price of the
Athlon64 machine :)

regards
stefan andersson


-- http://www.sanders3d.com/

---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi



---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi

  • References:

Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.