Re: Dual Core, Dual

Date : Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:01:20 +0200
To : XSI(at)Softimage.COM
From : Stefan Andersson <sanders3d(at)gmail.com>
Subject : Re: Dual Core, Dual
I made a test here a few weeks ago (though I wrote down the wrong
opteron version which now is corrected)

It was a fairly simple scene with dirtmap, reflections and a toon
shader. This is the comparisment for the frame that took the longest
time.

1 x AMD Athlon64 3500+, 1GB Ram             04:29
2 x Intel XEON 3.2 Ghz, 2GB Ram                04:03
2 x AMD Opteron 250, 2GB Ram                  02:11

regards
stefan andersson


On 7/26/05, digimata <digimata(at)digimata.com> wrote:
> Anyone have the experience use a Dual core AMD 4400 Athlon
> vs a dual core, dual Opteron 275.?
> 
> The Opterons Dual cores are twice as much money as the Athlon Dual cores.
> Someone told me the Athlon 4400 is about the same speed as a Dual core
> Opteron 275.
> I am deciding between 2 dual core Athlon vs 1 Dual, dual core Opteron.
> 
> Leoung
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
> 


-- 
http://www.sanders3d.com/

---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi


Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.