Re[4]: unlimited network rendering

Date : Sat, 8 Oct 2005 00:34:46 +0200
To : XSI(at)Softimage.COM
From : Frank Lenhard <franky(at)ixdream.com>
Subject : Re[4]: unlimited network rendering
hehe, after several weeks without much sleep, digging into xsi(most
exciting), reading quite some news the last days and kicking off a company
its hard to find a relaxed state of mind :)
but i will try harder.

for max users. of course they dont render with mental ray regulary.
its too expensive. max got all the renderer in the world (ok almost)
so there is no need to pay quite some bucks for MR licenses. i myself
own brazil and was quite happy. even if it has a similiar
license sheme like mr, just a lot cheaper.
but developers like splutterfish might get into trouble if mr comes
for free with max. that might be right...

ciao
franky

Friday, October 7, 2005, 11:18:42 PM, you wrote:

AD> Most MAXX users don't even render with Mental Ray, so I wouldn't get too
AD> uptight about all this.

AD> And besides, as yourself what effect this is going to have on third
AD> party rendereing tools?  Are they going to be happy?

AD> As I said before, you can rest assured that Softimage will match
AD> whatever autodek come up with.  Relax a little.

AD> -----Original Message-----
AD> From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf
AD> Of Frank Lenhard
AD> Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 5:05 PM
AD> To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
AD> Subject: Re[2]: unlimited network rendering

AD> if it supports backburner, i dont care how the license is called.
AD> backburner renders animations over a network. its not distributed
AD> rendering, its like batchserv.
AD> so, even if its not called mr standalon, but i can let 100slaves render
AD> animation, where each slave crunches on one frame at a time, its the
AD> same effect at the end.
AD> it might not have standalone licenses where you can render mi files and
AD> all  that stuff, but for the max user it doesnt make a difference.
AD> it gives them a huge advantage money wise, and makes a statement useless
AD> i read some weeks ago here... you cant bill your client for xsi
AD> rendering anymore then. why should they pay? they can have the same
AD> renderpower for free with the student next door.... hmmm i would like to
AD> see something official from autodesk, but as much as i look i dont see
AD> anything.

AD> ciao
AD> franky


AD> Friday, October 7, 2005, 9:00:18 PM, you wrote:

BL>> Fabio, it doesn't support support mr standalone.
BL>> Sorry :-)

BL>> Bernard

BL>> On 10/7/05, fabio lissi <flissi(at)bigbanganimation.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Do we know if this feature will support MR standalone ? If this is 
>>> the case I foresee the option to buy just one Max license, for the
AD> render farm :-).
>>>
>>>     Fabio

BL>> ---
BL>> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
AD> body:
BL>> unsubscribe xsi


AD> ---
AD> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
AD> body:
AD> unsubscribe xsi

AD> ---
AD> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
AD> unsubscribe xsi


---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi


Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.