>>>
>>>
>>> They probably had a good budget to start with, and probably someone
>>> of the advert company or the marketing division did a good job
>>> convincing the decision makers that spending this budget on live
>>> action would give a better result than faking it in CG.
>>>
>>> From our point of view, as 3D professionals this is probably weird,
>>> as it does seem like a good case for CG, a nothing that any high end
>>> 3D house wouldnt be able to pull off.
>>> it would be interesting to see a comparative budget for doing this
>>> live and doing it CG, might be revealing.
>>>
>>> And does it look better in the end?
>>> I'm not convinced of that seeing this spot.
>>
I found it quite boring...
the only interesting shot is the one with the frog.
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
