err... no
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 16:03 +0100, Adam Seeley wrote:
> It's probably a CG frog.
>
> A.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: luc froehlicher [mailto:lulu(at)alamaison.fr]
> Sent: 25 October 2005 15:25
> To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
> Subject: Re: Sony Âs new advert without
>
>
>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> They probably had a good budget to start with, and probably someone
> >>> of the advert company or the marketing division did a good job
> >>> convincing the decision makers that spending this budget on live
> >>> action would give a better result than faking it in CG.
> >>>
> >>> From our point of view, as 3D professionals this is probably weird,
> >>> as it does seem like a good case for CG, a nothing that any high end
> >>> 3D house wouldnt be able to pull off.
> >>> it would be interesting to see a comparative budget for doing this
> >>> live and doing it CG, might be revealing.
> >>>
> >>> And does it look better in the end?
> >>> I'm not convinced of that seeing this spot.
> >>
> I found it quite boring...
> the only interesting shot is the one with the frog.
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
> For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
> ______________________________________________________________________
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
--
Jordi Bares <jordibares(at)the-mill.com>
The Mill
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
