Ewwwww poor little Frog... Pelted by rubber balls.... What a cruel
advertising, destroying the rare urban fauna for PR reasons. Where is
PETA when you need them... ;-)
Jordi Bares wrote:
err... no
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 16:03 +0100, Adam Seeley wrote:
It's probably a CG frog.
A.
-----Original Message-----
From: luc froehlicher [mailto:lulu(at)alamaison.fr]
Sent: 25 October 2005 15:25
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: Re: Sony Âs new advert without
They probably had a good budget to start with, and probably someone
of the advert company or the marketing division did a good job
convincing the decision makers that spending this budget on live
action would give a better result than faking it in CG.
From our point of view, as 3D professionals this is probably weird,
as it does seem like a good case for CG, a nothing that any high end
3D house wouldnt be able to pull off.
it would be interesting to see a comparative budget for doing this
live and doing it CG, might be revealing.
And does it look better in the end?
I'm not convinced of that seeing this spot.
I found it quite boring...
the only interesting shot is the one with the frog.
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
