RE: lattice problem
| Date : Tue, 1 Nov 2005 15:24:17 -0000 |
| To : "'XSI(at)Softimage.COM'" <XSI(at)Softimage.COM> |
| From : Andi Farhall <andi(at)clear.ltd.uk> |
| Subject : RE: lattice problem |
|
The attachment is a mystery - apologies
to all From: Andi Farhall
[mailto:andi(at)clear.ltd.uk] Dunno if anyone has come across this one before, the falloff
from a lattice has a kink in it but only on one side I think. Try the script
and note the kink in the lower section of the cylinder. Using the relative
falloff makes no difference to it. Bit of a pain
Andi.
______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________ |
| DATE: | << | >> | THREAD: | << | >> | INDEX: | Main | Thread |
|---|
- Previous by Date: Duplicating and Constraining a 2D Chain
- Next by Date: Duplicating and Constraining a 2D Chain
- Previous by Thread: Duplicating and Constraining a 2D Chain
- Next by Thread: Duplicating and Constraining a 2D Chain
- Index(es):
| Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available. |
