Re: Linux?
| Date : Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:06:45 +0000 |
| To : XSI(at)Softimage.COM |
| From : Alan Jones <skyphyr(at)gmail.com> |
| Subject : Re: Linux? |
Cheers,
Alan.
On 1/11/06, Raffaele Fragapane <jaco(at)thejaco.com> wrote:
shake isn't as picky as XSI, but it's not THAT much better.
we've had to stick with FC3 here because it seems to be the only middle
ground right now where we can run everything, but other then that I have
to say it's by far the worst distro I've worked on insofar.
******************************
| Raffaele Fragapane |
| Rising Sun Pictures |
| "Remember, TD is for TopDog" |
******************************
DeColling, James wrote:
>Working well in general or working well for XSI?
>
>Also is there a happy medium that will let others like Maya / Shake run
>well?
>Or is it just xsi that's picky?
>
>
>Cheers
>
>
>James,
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM ] On Behalf Of
>Stefan Andersson
>Sent: Wednesday, 11 January 2006 4:19 AM
>To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
>Subject: Re: Re[2]: Linux?
>
>FC3 is certified, FC4 is not, which is a shame since FC4 seems to be
>working really well.
>
>regards
>stefan
>
>
>On 1/10/06, Adrian Wyer <adrian(at)the-mill.com> wrote:
>
>
>>i was lead to believe fc3 is NOT certified for xsi?
>>we are about to set up with RH enterprise becasue it's certified to work
>>
>>hmmmm
>>
>>a
>>
>>adrian wyer
>>head of 3d
>>milltv
>> adrian(at)the-mill.com
>>www.the-mill.com
>>t: +44 (0)20 7287 4041
>>f: +44 (0)20 7915 0551
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Jordi Bares" <jordibares(at)the-mill.com>
>>To: <XSI(at)softimage.com>
>>Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 4:55 PM
>>Subject: Re: Re[2]: Linux?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Sometimes the performance of XSI is limited by the driver, once upated
>>>suddenly flies... things like that... strange artifacts in the viewport.
>>>In few words, the drivers always are a bit more flaky in linux from my
>>>experience but nvidia is very fast updating them and fixing things so i
>>>guess i can live happy with it.
>>>
>>>On the other side remember we all have gone thru the transition from
>>>RedHat 7.2 to FC2 and FC3, so has been a funny time. I don't expect to
>>>happen again anytime soon. FC3 is excelent
>>>
>>>jb
>>>
>>>On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 10:02 +0000, Alan Jones wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hey Jordi,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The only problems are nvidia drivers and alike, the rest
>>>> (thanks to some
>>>> linux guru) is pretty invisible and works like a charm.
>>>>
>>>>What trouble are you guys having with Nvidia drivers?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Cheers,
>>>>
>>>>Alan.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>--
>>>Jordi Bares <jordibares(at)the-mill.com>
>>>The Mill
>>>
>>>
>>>---
>>>Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
>>>
>>>
>body:
>
>
>>>unsubscribe xsi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>---
>>Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
>>unsubscribe xsi
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>________________________________________________________________________
>http://stefan.sanders3d.com/
> http://os3d.blogspot.com/
>
>---
>Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
>unsubscribe xsi
>---
>Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
>unsubscribe xsi
>
>
>
>
>
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
- References:
- RE: Re[2]: Linux?
- From: "DeColling, James" <James.DeColling(at)atari.com>
- Re: Linux?
- From: Raffaele Fragapane <jaco(at)thejaco.com>
- RE: Re[2]: Linux?
| DATE: | << | >> | THREAD: | << | >> | INDEX: | Main | Thread |
|---|
- Previous by Date: Re: Re[2]: Linux?
- Next by Date: Re: Re[2]: Linux?
- Previous by Thread: Re: Re[2]: Linux?
- Next by Thread: Re: Re[2]: Linux?
- Index(es):
| Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available. |