Re: "real" cameras in xsi

Date : Fri, 27 Jan 2006 11:36:24 +0000
To : XSI(at)Softimage.COM
From : Chris Shaw <cjdshaw.bulk(at)blueyonder.co.uk>
Subject : Re: "real" cameras in xsi
Apparently, you should use tracking markers as well.
Chris

Harry Bardak wrote:
Different angle photos from a camera that you know perfectly the lens length and the lens distortion ( I m using a Canon 300D ) may help to make an accurate tracking with no pain even if you don't know the shot details.


Harry Bardak TD / Compositor.

Http://perso.wanadoo.fr/harry.bardak/
+33 6 76 63 35 54
+44 781 661 4147


From: Jordi Bares <jordibares(at)the-mill.com>
Reply-To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: Re: "real" cameras in xsi
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:24:34 +0000

I would be happy if the cameras store accurate lens information per
frame, that *truly* would help us.

About camera position and orientation, you are going to need an
incredible accuracy when dealing with certain shots, therefore i am not
expecting this to happen anytime soon.

jb
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi


Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.