You follow all the rules - take ALL the measurements - take all the
reference photos you'll ever need - use dozens of perfect tracking
markers. Should work surely, until you realise the clients have done an
extreme dynamic pan and scan in TK
Grumble grumble
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf
Of Chris Shaw
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 11:36 AM
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: Re: "real" cameras in xsi
Apparently, you should use tracking markers as well.
Chris
Harry Bardak wrote:
> Different angle photos from a camera that you know perfectly the lens
> length and the lens distortion ( I m using a Canon 300D ) may help to
> make an accurate tracking with no pain even if you don't know the shot
> details.
>
>
> Harry Bardak
> TD / Compositor.
>
> Http://perso.wanadoo.fr/harry.bardak/
> +33 6 76 63 35 54
> +44 781 661 4147
>
>
>> From: Jordi Bares <jordibares(at)the-mill.com>
>> Reply-To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
>> To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
>> Subject: Re: "real" cameras in xsi
>> Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:24:34 +0000
>>
>> I would be happy if the cameras store accurate lens information per
>> frame, that *truly* would help us.
>>
>> About camera position and orientation, you are going to need an
>> incredible accuracy when dealing with certain shots, therefore i am
not
>> expecting this to happen anytime soon.
>>
>> jb
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body:
unsubscribe xsi
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
