RE: "real" cameras in xsi

Date : Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:01:19 +0000
To : XSI(at)Softimage.COM
From : Jordi Bares <jordibares(at)the-mill.com>
Subject : RE: "real" cameras in xsi
Or painted and extended the plate before and never tell you... why
should you know?

;-)

jb

On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 13:17 +0000, kim aldis wrote:
> And swear blind they never moved the camera. 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM 
> > [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Andi Farhall
> > Sent: 27-January-2006 11:49
> > To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
> > Subject: RE: "real" cameras in xsi
> > 
> > You follow all the rules - take ALL the measurements - take 
> > all the reference photos you'll ever need - use dozens of 
> > perfect tracking markers. Should work surely, until you 
> > realise the clients have done an extreme dynamic pan and scan in TK
> > 
> 
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
-- 
Jordi Bares <jordibares(at)the-mill.com>
The Mill


---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi


Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.