Re: Children maintaining visibility status independent of parent.

Date : Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:09:17 +0000
To : XSI(at)Softimage.COM
From : Chris Marshall <chris(at)eclipsecreative.co.uk>
Subject : Re: Children maintaining visibility status independent of parent.
exactly! damn!
my head hurts! damn!


kim aldis wrote:

damn, you're right. That's not right, you should be able to key everything.
You can't key partitition visibility either but you can add a visibility
property, as you can to a group but that doesn't seem to override the group
visibility. damn!!


_____


From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of
Chris Marshall
Sent: 31-January-2006 16:50
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: Re: Children maintaining visibility status independent of parent.


Keying hierarchy visibility in XSI has always, and as far as I know still is, a headache. Groups used to be the fallback position, but I'm pretty sure that changed a couple of versions ago, when they removed the ability to key these properties (from what I remember). I think Partitions are the only way to do this.

Chris


kim aldis wrote:


I've just tried removing the visibility property from child nodes and that

doesn't work so I'm guessing there's no way to have visibility inherit. This

rings some bells from very early releases of xsi.



The only thing I can suggest is that you take a look at layers, groups and

partitions. There's a great deal of power with these, although they're not

so hierarchy savvy so they may not suit.







---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi


Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.