Are you kidding, Guillaume?? It aint
funny dude!! ;)
Adrian L.
From:
owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of guillaume laforge
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006
12:50 PM
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: Re: 5.1 build no. did it
work?
They hide the build number in the render option. If you set the
filtering to Mitchell it gives 1 - 1 in 5.0 and 4-4 in 5.01. It is a
secret code ;-)
On 2/21/06, Adrian L
<liquidlight(at)cwjamaica.com>
wrote:
Yah, but how do we know if the install worked? Shouldn't the
build number,
or something, change?
Adrian L.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM
[mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM]
On Behalf Of
Halfdan Ingvarsson
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 11:53 AM
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: RE: 5.1 build no. did it work?
It's semi-official version number is 5.0.1, rather than 5.1.
Just a bug fix update.
- ½
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM
> [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM ]On
Behalf
> Of Adrian L
> Sent: Tuesday, 21 February, 2006 11:49
> To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
> Subject: 5.1 build no. did it work?
>
>
>
> Could someone confirm the Build no. AFTER the 5.1 patch install? The
> softimage window still says 5.0, and our build no. is 5.0.2005.1013-1
>
> We're wondering if the patch "took"
>
> Thanks
>
> Adrian L.
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM
with the following
> text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM
with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM
with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
