Re: size does matter

Date : Mon, 06 Mar 2006 19:58:17 +0000
To : XSI(at)Softimage.COM
From : Helen Bucknall <helen(at)helenbucknall.com>
Subject : Re: size does matter
Thanks Bernard,
I had eschewed that panel because of the seems issues with bumpmapping. But zbump has fixed all that now, so UV remap is good.
Cheers.


Bernard Lebel wrote:

Have you tried different settings with the UV Remap option of the shader?

Btw I share 100% your views, I too come from max and procedurals is
something I greatly miss.


Cheers Bernard



On 3/6/06, Helen Bucknall <helen(at)helenbucknall.com> wrote:


I feel this is a very basic question, but how the hell do you adjust the
SIZE of the fractal node?
I've spent ages over the last 18 months fiddling with the projection and
the diffusion and the complexity and all the other sliders, but I never
feel I get the result I want easily. Also sometime the sliders seem to
do nothing at all...is it me?

It seems to be easy to get really tiny patterns, but impossible to get a
large one without scaling the projection up to billio.

In Max there is just a 'size' slider for fractal. Is there any
equivalent in xsi?

Cheers.

---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi




--- Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe xsi







---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi


Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.