Also take a look at the Binary Alchemy shaders, they seem to behave more
properly and have built-in extra's.
rob
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf
Of Helen Bucknall
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 8:58 PM
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: Re: size does matter
Thanks Bernard,
I had eschewed that panel because of the seems issues with bumpmapping.
But zbump has fixed all that now, so UV remap is good.
Cheers.
Bernard Lebel wrote:
>Have you tried different settings with the UV Remap option of the
shader?
>
>Btw I share 100% your views, I too come from max and procedurals is
>something I greatly miss.
>
>
>Cheers
>Bernard
>
>
>
>On 3/6/06, Helen Bucknall <helen(at)helenbucknall.com> wrote:
>
>
>>I feel this is a very basic question, but how the hell do you adjust
>>the SIZE of the fractal node?
>>I've spent ages over the last 18 months fiddling with the projection
>>and the diffusion and the complexity and all the other sliders, but I
>>never feel I get the result I want easily. Also sometime the sliders
>>seem to do nothing at all...is it me?
>>
>>It seems to be easy to get really tiny patterns, but impossible to get
>>a large one without scaling the projection up to billio.
>>
>>In Max there is just a 'size' slider for fractal. Is there any
>>equivalent in xsi?
>>
>>Cheers.
>>
>>---
>>Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body:
>>unsubscribe xsi
>>
>>
>>
>
>---
>Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body:
>unsubscribe xsi
>
>
>
>
>
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body:
unsubscribe xsi
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
