RE: Face Robot Designer at 94.995$ US?

Date : Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:21:55 -0500
To : <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
From : "Halfdan Ingvarsson" <hingvars(at)Softimage.COM>
Subject : RE: Face Robot Designer at 94.995$ US?
It's a win-win!
 
 - ½
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM]On Behalf Of Paul-Jozef "PJ" Torrevillas
Sent: Friday, 10 March, 2006 14:15
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: RE: Face Robot Designer at 94.995$ US?

Then they find out and you’re screwed!  Hah….

 

 

PJ

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.C
OM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of kim aldis
Sent:
Friday, March 10, 2006 10:50 AM
To:
XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: RE: Face Robot Designer at 94.995$ US?

 

I add 3 years together and call it 6. If you're clever you could add 6 years and call it 12, impress the girls  and get laid.

 


From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Gene Crucean
Sent: 10-March-2006 18:03
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: Re: Face Robot Designer at 94.995$ US?

Wait wait wait.... when do I start making 6 figures? Do all artists make 6 figures? Why am I not included in that possy? Damnit!

Just kiddin ya Andre ;)




On 3/10/06, Paul-Jozef PJ Torrevillas <ptorrevillas(at)omation.com > wrote:

Attended the launch party in LA last night and saw some pretty impressive
stuff with the software.  All I could think of the whole time was I wanted
to get my hands on it to try it out for myself.  It was really nice to see
too that you could animate on top of motion capture data and you were not
just constricted to it.  They also demo'd how much level you had with the
flexibility of the rig.  I spoke with David Andrews who is currently
animating with it, and he said that it was great to actually be able to (as
an artist) to tweak things at the most subtle detail on the spot.

PJ

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of
lpiasecki76
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 5:53 PM
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: RE: Face Robot Designer at 94.995$ US?

The videos are good, but honestly, I've seem more realistic looking facial
animations from some very skilled animators.  Of course, I'm not certain how
long it took them in comparison with how long it would have taken them with
Face Robot. SI better get some sample money saving calculations if they want
studios to pay 100K for a piece of software :-). But then again innovation
is expensive.  I must admit though that I was hoping to see something more
realistic than the plastic looking face (the secretary animation - making
of).


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of
Will Mendez
Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2006 8:07 PM
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: Re: Face Robot Designer at 94.995$ US?

There is also a making of video here
http://softimage.com/products/face_robot/video_gallery/default.aspx

/Will


Adrian Lopez wrote:
> I do find it odd that video clips showing this what this hundred
> grander can do are  suspiciously scarce. I can only find two examples,
> the U2 video and Blur's character face thats been around for months.
>
> Adrian L.
>
> On 3/9/06, *Adrian Lopez* <liquidlightdigital(at)gmail.com
> <mailto:liquidlightdigital(at)gmail.com >> wrote:
>
>     I dont think its either or..   even with facerobot, I'm sure you
>     still need animators to tweak, it cant possibly do everything to
>     production quality without creative intervention.
>
>     Adrian L.
>

---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi

---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi


---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi




--
-gc


Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.