Re: Conversion calculator real 35mm camera to softimage fov

Date : Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:25:57 -0500
To : <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
From : "Marc Bourbonnais" <marc(at)hybride.com>
Subject : Re: Conversion calculator real 35mm camera to softimage fov
Ahh, that's the kind of stuff TDs eat for breakfast.

Thanks for the input Chris.
--
Marc Bourbonnais
3D TD
Hybride
(450)227-4245
----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Shaw" <cjdshaw.bulk(at)blueyonder.co.uk>
To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2006 7:13 AM
Subject: Re: Conversion calculator real 35mm camera to softimage fov



It's because the scanning chip has pixels exactly 6microns by 6microns. That means that a full ap scan should really be 4149x3111. To make the numbers nicer, they scan a little less on the left, and a hair more vertically to give 4096x3112. What we usually deal with is half-resolution scans, hence 2048x1556.

Chris

Marc Bourbonnais wrote:
That's why you have to take scanning into account. The real real real size of a modern 35mm Full Aperture frame is 0.980"x0.735", so 1.333 ratio.
-but-
depending on the scanner, slight cropping can/might/will occur. For most Cineon scans (what I see coming in here anyway), you'll get a 1.3162 ratio image; 2048x1556 for 2K scans. To be honest I don't exactly know why, some engineering issues had to be dealt with the scanners I believe. Kinda like color NTSC is now 29.97 fps, not 30 fps. If anyone can give me a straight history lesson on film scan cropping, be my guest. I've asked around and all I can do is take these numbers and go with it.


Since these values have very small variations, and we're talking about an optical lens effect, projected on a mechanical moving reel, the cropped with a machine that reprojects it frame by frame for a digitally scanned image result, a 100th+ of an inch precision is a bit overkill. But hey, it's always better to base everything on true values.

--
Marc Bourbonnais
3D TD
Hybride
(450)227-4245
----- Original Message ----- From: "Francois Lord" <francoislord(at)gmail.com>
To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 3:14 PM
Subject: Re: Conversion calculator real 35mm camera to softimage fov



This chart says that 35mm Full Aperture in 2K is 2048 x 1556 with a ratio of 1.33. But 2048 / 1556 gives 1.3162.

Marc Bourbonnais wrote:

Ah. I was wondering about your original figures. You're correct about the scanning area, it's all that matters really.

And yes, there are slight crops on a regular FA scans, but since it varies just a slight 1.3% I forgot about it long ago, my mistake. We usually nudge camera lens a few mm when we adjust trackings anyway. I bother with crops & shifts when we get to Academy framing, to keep our cameras as simple as possible; it's already a pain to keep everyone using decent camera values in prod. But your numbers are true to what's really happening.

Cinesite has a hard-to-find scanning chart here:
http://www.cinesite.com/CineonTech/resoultions/ResChart.html

--
Marc Bourbonnais
3D TD
Hybride
(450)227-4245
----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Shaw" <cjdshaw.bulk(at)blueyonder.co.uk>
To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 1:02 PM
Subject: Re: Conversion calculator real 35mm camera to softimage fov



The key thing is really the area which is scanned though. The size of the mask will only affect whether you get black edges on your scans. I've been over this in detail with Cinesite's scanning department. It may vary between scan houses, of course.

Incidentally, my last mail had a type. It should be 0.967"x0.735". My bad.

Chris

Andi Farhall wrote:

I was at a shoot last week and was bugging the cameraman about stuff and he pulled out the mask from the arri camera they were using and showed me the mask which was arri's version of open gate and was 24.25mm*18.6mm and isn't 4:3 and there is also a tiny horizontal shift . Apparently these mask sizes vary depending on which camera manufacturer the mask is for. I downloaded "The ARRI-Guide for Ground Glasses.pdf from arri's website which has the dimensions for all of the masks that they make which is handy.
Andi




-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Chris Shaw
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 3:29 PM
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: Re: Conversion calculator real 35mm camera to softimage fov


Actually, a 2k scan looses a little bit on the left compared with the full 35mm frame. Hence 0.976" x 0.735". Technically, you should also offset your optical center slightly to the left, but there's enough error in the lens to make this shift irrelevant.
Chris


Marc Bourbonnais wrote:

true 35 mm Full Aperture is 0.980"x0.735". That's for 1.333 ratio.
Sometimes scans can come in with a little more pixels in height, so you should use 0.980"x0.745" for a 1.3162 image ratio if it's the case.
--
Marc Bourbonnais
3D TD
Hybride
(450)227-4245


----- Original Message -----
*From:* Marc Bommersheim <mailto:marc(at)freie-digitale.de>
*To:* XSI(at)Softimage.COM <mailto:XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
*Sent:* Monday, March 13, 2006 8:46 AM
*Subject:* Re: Conversion calculator real 35mm camera to softimage fov


   Thank you. Do you know the arperture size of open gate 35mm?

   On Mar 13, 2006, at 10:05 0AM, Aleš Dlabač wrote:


   if you know aperture size in inches you could use XSI. in camera
   properties/projection plane tab. enter proper values including
   focal length(mm) and your angle is computed.

   Hope this helps you a little

   Ales Dlabac

   Hi,
   is there an easy way to calculate softimage xsi fov angles from
   real  world 35mm lenses?

   Kind regards

   Marc


--- Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM <mailto:Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM> with the following text in body: unsubscribe xsi .



--- Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM <mailto:Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM> with the following text in body: unsubscribe xsi



Mit freundlichen Grüßen

   Marc Bommersheim


+49 69 97206740 marc(at)freie-digitale.de <mailto:marc(at)freie-digitale.de>



---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________


---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi




---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi





---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi



--- Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe xsi




--- Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe xsi



--- Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe xsi




--- Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe xsi


Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.