Re: XSI 5.1

Date : Fri, 31 Mar 2006 21:56:07 +0200
To : XSI(at)Softimage.COM
From : "Thomas Helzle" <xsi(at)screendream.de>
Subject : Re: XSI 5.1
OK, Please Softimage, don't fix this bug, everybody seems to love it.
Just ignore me.
I just had a horrible day with nothing but bugs in different apps, so it may just be my bad mood that prevents me from fully appreciating it.
Maybe you could even improve the bug to create 16bit tiffs which are just one pixel in height instead of 3 so they would fit in one reeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaally long row and can be viewed by 1D beings conveniently while sliding along?

Just forget it.

Over and out.

Thomas "BUGs Bunny" Helzle


On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 21:32:32 +0200, Alan Jones <skyphyr(at)gmail.com> wrote:

Why not use 16bit SGIs? They work fine.

Cheers,

Alan.

On 3/31/06, Thomas Helzle <xsi(at)screendream.de> wrote:

Sorry, this IS nonsense. The image comes out with a completely wrong aspect ratio. In some other apps I'm able to correct it by hand after importing (DFX+) but neither Photoshop nor After Effects accept the crazy values, which is not their fault IMO. Even Softimage ImgConv spits out three lines of errors per image - although it is able to correct it. This has simply nothing to do with Adobe.

I do lot's of high res illustrations currently which need 16Bit for smooth
gradients and this Bug is super annoying after a while.

Please tell me that it is gone in 5.1 :-)

Thomas Helzle

On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 19:47:06 +0200, Greg Smith <greg(at)stanwinston.com>
wrote:

> You know,  not that I am saying that this shouldn't be addressed by any
> means, but the only program that I have noticed that has an issue with
> 16-bit or floating point tiffs that are generated in XSI is photoshop.
> Almost all of the other software we use that read in 16-bit tiffs, with
> exception of Photoshop. So I might go out on a limb and say that the
issue
> is probably more of a Adobe issue than Soft. However the likelyhood of
> getting Adobe to address the issue is probably more far fetched.
>
> ahh well thats my nonsense moment of week.
>
> Greg
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Thomas Helzle" <xsi(at)screendream.de>
> To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 2:38 AM
> Subject: Re: XSI 5.1
>
>
>> One question:
>> Are the problems with 16 Bit Tiffs solved in 5.1?
>> While I can fix the images with ImgConv, I would love to spare that
extra
> step...
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>> Thomas Helzle
>>
>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 20:42:31 +0100, Bob Cobb <bob(at)vaporpost.com> wrote:
>>
>> > http://forums.cgsociety.org/showthread.php?t=332134
>> > ---
>> > Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
> body:
>> > unsubscribe xsi
>> >
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body:
>> unsubscribe xsi
>
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>


--- Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe xsi




---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi

  • References:
    • XSI 5.1
      • From: Bob Cobb <bob(at)vaporpost.com>
    • Re: XSI 5.1
      • From: "Thomas Helzle" <xsi(at)screendream.de>
    • Re: XSI 5.1
      • From: "Greg Smith" <greg(at)stanwinston.com>
    • Re: XSI 5.1
      • From: "Thomas Helzle" <xsi(at)screendream.de>
    • Re: XSI 5.1
      • From: "Alan Jones" <skyphyr(at)gmail.com>

Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.