Re: 5.1 asset import question

[todd akita <takita(at)earthlink.net>]

Seems to be working fine on both particles and hair here.  The only 
funny thing I've noticed is that it's bad to set your cycling to 
negative numbers otherwise your geometry gets crumpled up real bad.  But 
then again it wasn't like you know, really fancy particles with scripted 
events and rendertree stuff...

-T

kim aldis wrote:
>  
> I'd check out using PO with particles and hair before you jump to too many
> conclusion in that respect, Todd. I've only briefly looked at particles but
> I didn't have a lot of luck. Not tried hair yet.
>
>
>   
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM 
> > [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of todd akita
> > Sent: 04-April-2006 21:18
> > To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
> > Subject: Re: 5.1 asset import question
> >
> > so you could do some neat things with particle/hair 
> > instancing and get some very nice performance gains by 
> > throwing away all the rigging (which can get very heavy 
> > depending on the number of instance masters you have). 
> >     
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
>   

---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi