Re: ZBrush+XSI+Normalmaps - plus displacement?

Date : Tue, 11 Apr 2006 15:20:20 +0200
To : <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
From : "Tim Leydecker" <BauerOink(at)gmx.de>
Subject : Re: ZBrush+XSI+Normalmaps - plus displacement?
Hi Holger,

Thanks, I will take a look into it this evening.
Did not had time this week to test and read your thread links.

No problem. I´d really appreciate if you can share your results. I´ve ZBrush 2 lying around for quite a while now.

There´s loads and loads of stuff I have get worked out in
both ZBrush and XSI - those damn blokes at FH Wiesbaden
and the related diploma set me back a rough 2 years in actually
doing 3D and getting a grasp of the latest tools and techniques.

But for the quads you mentioned: all of our models are made
with quads, cause there have been some reports that n-gons
are not very good if you use Zbrush and displacement.

the n-gons get tesselated into tris/quads, changing the meshorder. Not a good thing for something allready enveloped or animated.

Cheers

tim



----- Original Message ----- From: "Schoenberger" <XSI(at)digidragon.de>
To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 2:17 PM
Subject: RE: ZBrush+XSI+Normalmaps - plus displacement?




Thanks, I will take a look into it this evening. Did not had time this week to test and read your thread links.

But for the quads you mentioned: all of our models are made
with quads, cause there have been some reports that n-gons
are not very good if you use Zbrush and displacement.


Holger Schönberger technical director The day has 24 hours, if that does not suffice, I will take the night



|> -----Original Message-----
|> From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM
|> [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Tim Leydecker
|> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 1:07 PM
|> To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
|> Subject: Re: ZBrush+XSI+Normalmaps - plus displacement?
|>
|> Hey Holger,
|>
|> I see there´s other people that share their problems,
|> here´s a (looong)
|> thread about XSI 5.1 (most will notice, saw some familiar
|> names). A subthread of this picks on the way the non-quad
|> subdivision displacement works, e.g. not works.
|>
|> http://forums.cgsociety.org/showthread.php?t=332248&page=7&pp=15
|> (single examplepost, francescaluce)
|> http://forums.cgsociety.org/showpost.php?p=3418588&postcount=98
|>
|> I´m sorry. I didn´t not realize. Out of routine I tediously build
|> my models *quads only*, makes I/O between apps alot stabler.
|> I currently often transfer between Maya/XSI/ZBrush.
|>
|> I try to never have n-gons (originally due to UV stretch) and will
|> only have tri´s on wip models, I guess that´s why my tringulated
|> meshes when passed over to mR made no problems with normals
|> up to now.
|>
|> Thanks for making me aware.
|>
|> I´d also welcome a reliable fix asap, just to make sure.
|>
|>
|> tim
|>
|>
|>
|>
|> ----- Original Message ----- |> From: "Tim Leydecker" <BauerOink(at)gmx.de>
|> To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
|> Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 11:35 PM
|> Subject: Re: ZBrush+XSI+Normalmaps - plus displacement?
|>
|>
|> > There´s another thing regarding the flipping you get.
|> >
|> > I have problems correctly making out the 0-1 range
|> > in the UV Textureeditor, together with wrap this
|> > could be the reason your UV´s are scaled back into
|> > the 0-1 range, simply looking wrong...
|> >
|> > Other than that, what you describe sounds like you
|> > haven´t vertically flipped the (bump/normal) image
|> > from ZBrush for use in XSI. Both Maya and XSI
|> > require the images coming from ZBrush to be flipped in V.
|> >
|> > You should easily be able to test this using the imagenode
|> > Adjust/transform settings, having the image piped into
|> > the diffuse for better viewing.
|> >
|> > This is a bitchy thing, especially when working with large
|> > amounts of textures and AUV tiles, where it´s difficult to
|> > make out what the heck is on the image anyway.
|> >
|> > All hard Normals could be because you imported the
|> > *.obj files having "usernormals" checked, I allways have
|> > those ignored, XSI has it´s personally prefered 60°...
|> > Maya has 30°, Max 35°. Stuff therefore *can never*
|> > look as smooth (compared to tesselation) as a default
|> > XSI model.
|> >
|> > Cheers
|> >
|> > tim
|> >
|> > P.S: Setting up smoothinggroups/usernormals in XSI isn´t *ideal*.
|> >
|> >
|> >
|> >
|> > ----- Original Message ----- |> > From: "Schoenberger" <XSI(at)digidragon.de>
|> > To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
|> > Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 2:52 PM
|> > Subject: RE: ZBrush+XSI+Normalmaps - plus displacement?
|> >
|> >
|> >>
|> >>
|> >> I have the same problem. I got the problem on January
|> and did not find a solution
|> >> till now.
|> >> There are threads on XSI base and cgTalk, started new
|> threads, nothing...
|> >>
|> >> It looks like the bump is flipping between polygons, right?
|> >> It flips at your texture UV seams.
|> >> If you don't use a normalmap, if you use displacement
|> only, then your normals are
|> >> not smoothed at your UV seems, you always get hard
|> >> edges. This problem can be ignored if your normal map
|> would work right...
|> >>
|> >> The only workaround I found was to create an UV map on
|> your own and put the UV
|> >> seams where you don't see them. But I have some
|> >> models where I cannot hide my UV seams...
|> >>
|> >> I tried to use the new XSI Ultimapper to create a
|> normal map from a highres mesh
|> >> onto a lowres one, same problem...
|> >> Has anybody ever used normalmaps with XSI?
|> >>
|> >>
|> >> Regards,
|> >> Holger Schönberger
|> >> technical director
|> >> The day has 24 hours, if that does not suffice, I will
|> take the night
|> >>
|> >>
|> >>
|> >> |> -----Original Message-----
|> >> |> From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM
|> >> |> [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Tim Leydecker
|> >> |> Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 1:20 AM
|> >> |> To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
|> >> |> Subject: ZBrush+XSI+Normalmaps - plus displacement?
|> >> |>
|> >> |> Hi folks,
|> >> |>
|> >> |> I have some problems getting XSI to correctly
|> >> |> use my *fresh* normalmaps created in ZBrush.
|> >> |>
|> >> |> Can you nurse me through the XSI specific
|> >> |> settings or provide a link to a tutorial or
|> >> |> samplenetwork that successfully uses
|> >> |> Normalmaps (from ZBrush) in XSI 5.01//5.1?
|> >> |>
|> >> |> Using the Multidisplacement2 plugin for ZBrush
|> >> |> I get great results for using 32bit *.tif images in
|> >> |> XSI for "fine" displacement, as long as I stick to
|> >> |> the shading network that is autocreated when you
|> >> |> import an *.obj file and set the alphafactor to 2.2.
|> >> |>
|> >> |> Now I´d like to add a Normalmap ontop the
|> >> |> displacement, e.g. the displaced surface but
|> >> |> can´t even get a simple Normalmap without
|> >> |> displacement to look right.
|> >> |>
|> >> |> Of course checked the the Greg Punchatz ZBrush+XSI
|> >> |> guide allready
|> http://206.145.80.239/zbc/showthread.php?t=30420
|> >> |> but really don´t get any further, I seem to have missed
|> >> |> some setting when creating the normalmaps somewhere.
|> >> |> It´s not the V-flip...
|> >> |>
|> >> |> Cheers
|> >> |>
|> >> |> tim
|> >> |>
|> >> |>
|> >> |>
|> >> |>
|> >> |> ---
|> >> |> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the
|> >> |> following text in body:
|> >> |> unsubscribe xsi
|> >> |>
|> >>
|> >>
|> >> ---
|> >> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the
|> following text in body:
|> >> unsubscribe xsi
|> >>
|> >
|> >
|> > ---
|> > Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the
|> following text in body:
|> > unsubscribe xsi
|> >
|>
|>
|> ---
|> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the
|> following text in body:
|> unsubscribe xsi
|>



--- Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe xsi



---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi


Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.