Unless I'm missing something obvious here... (which is possible ;-)
Isn't this more a grooming issue?
Say for example you get a regular sphere (8x8 U&V) and apply hair.
No matter what your hair count if you look 'down' the normals you'll always
see mesh.
Subdivide the mesh to hell, increase the hair count to zillions and without
grooming it's still the same deal.
So...
And yet more good stuff from La Maison:
http://www.alamaison.fr/3d/lmWeightMapTools/index.html
There's a tool in there for hair combing via weight map.
And, last question, Morten why is non-instanced hair orientation important?
cheers
_rob
----- Original Message -----
From: "kim aldis" <kim(at)cg-soup.com>
To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2006 10:26 AM
Subject: RE: Hair coverage control?
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM
[mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Ben Rogall
Sent: 20-April-2006 14:55
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: RE: Hair coverage control?
No, I'm sure I'm the one missing something. I only have
Essentials so I'm not up on the fur capabilities in Advanced.
So would using a texture solve Morten's issue?
Ben
Probably not, his problem is more to do with distribution than length.
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
