-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM
[mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Tim Leydecker
Sent: 16-May-2006 10:16
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: Re: Re[14]: 1 licence for two different versions
Don?t want to start a flamewar or get insulting to anyone.
Actually, I learned quite a bit from that thread.
Licensing (the SPM host, running concurring versions all
that) can be a bitchy thing and it?s shown that people here a
willing to help out - even if it?s distracting from their work.
To sum it up - it probably cost a quarter million bucks in
manhours (reading the posts, answering, maybe deleting them).
In the longrun it *could* save money and longhours thought.
Would be a shame if you?d unscubscribe but you?re free to do so...
Cheers
tim
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Helzle" <xsi(at)screendream.de>
To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: Re[14]: 1 licence for two different versions
> ....or maybe create a separate mailinglist for chris.
> Otherwise I think I will unsubscribe for a while.
>
> OMG
>
> Thomas Helzle
>
> On Sun, 14 May 2006 21:28:55 +0200, Will Mendez
<xsiwill(at)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Chris,
>>
>> Call support on Monday, Have them do a remote support
session on your
>> machine so that we can finally get to the bottom of this.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Will
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM
[mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of
>> kim aldis
>> Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 12:43 PM
>> To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
>> Subject: RE: Re[14]: 1 licence for two different versions
>>
>> Then if the value of that variable is supposed to be the
name of the machine
>> which is serving licenses, I'd say that's your problem.
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM
>>> [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Chris
>>> Sent: 14-May-2006 15:22
>>> To: kim aldis
>>> Subject: Re[14]: 1 licence for two different versions
>>>
>>> Hello kim, no it's not the name of the computer !
>>>
>>> Christopher
>>>
>>>
>>> Sunday, May 14, 2006, 2:45:34 AM, you wrote:
>>>
>>> > And is SPM_x the name of your machine?
>>>
>>>
>>> >> -----Original Message-----
>>> >> From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM
>>> >> [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Chris
>>> >> Sent: 13-May-2006 23:14
>>> >> To: kim aldis
>>> >> Subject: Re[12]: 1 licence for two different versions
>>> >>
>>> >> Hello kim, yes I'm running both from the same machine.
>>> Did the echo
>>> >> %SPM_HOST% and for the:
>>> >>
>>> >> 4.2 command prompt I just get this returned to me:
%SPM_HOST% 5.o
>>> >> command prompt I get this returned to me: SPM_x
>>> >>
>>> >> Christopher
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Saturday, May 13, 2006, 4:22:53 PM, you wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >> >> -----Original Message-----
>>> >> >> From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM
>>> >> >> [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Chris
>>> >> >> Sent: 13-May-2006 21:13
>>> >> >> To: kim aldis
>>> >> >> Subject: Re[10]: 1 licence for two different versions
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Saturday, May 13, 2006, 3:38:27 PM, you wrote:
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> > No, I'm saying that if you're running xsi from the same
>>> >> machine as
>>> >> >> > the license server then you don't *have* to set the
>>> >> >> spm_host variable.
>>> >> >> > However, if you do then it should be correct. You haven't
>>> >> >> said whether
>>> >> >> > you are running from the same machine or not. I don't
>>> >> know what you
>>> >> >> > may have already done to those files so I don't
know if you
>>> >> >> should do nothing or not.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> I have done nothing to the serv.bat files at all I have
>>> not edited
>>> >> >> them nothing there at there default settings.
>>> >>
>>> >> > I asked if you were running xsi from the same machine as
>>> >> the license server.
>>> >> > Are you?
>>> >>
>>> >> > Just because you've done nothing to them doesn't mean
>>> >> they're correct.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> I have a 5.0 licence running so your right the server
>>> is running.
>>> >> >> And to recap 4.2 will run from 5.0 *BUT* 5.0 doesn't run
>>> >> from a 5.0
>>> >> >> licence.
>>> >>
>>> >> > I was misunderstanding you. I thought you could run 5.0 but
>>> >> not 4.2. Sorry.
>>> >>
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Running "echo SPM_HOST" (without the quotes) at both 5.0 and
>>> >> >> 4.2 command prompt just gives me the following
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> SPM
>>> >> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> > You need to typ echo %SPM_HOST%, not echo SPM_HOST.
>>> >>
>>> >> > Once again, can you confirm that you're running spm
on the same
>>> >> > machine as you're running xsi. It has a bearing.
>>> >>
>>> >> > ---
>>> >> > Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the
>>> >> following text in body:
>>> >> > unsubscribe xsi
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Best regards,
>>> >> Chris mailto:walksfar(at)netscape.ca
>>> >>
>>> >> ---
>>> >> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the
>>> following text in
>>> >> body:
>>> >> unsubscribe xsi
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> > ---
>>> > Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the
>>> following text in body:
>>> > unsubscribe xsi
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> Chris mailto:walksfar(at)netscape.ca
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the
following text in
>>> body:
>>> unsubscribe xsi
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ---
>> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the
following text in body:
>> unsubscribe xsi
>>
>> ---
>> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the
following text in body:
>> unsubscribe xsi
>>
>
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the
following text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following
text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
