Re: 1 licence for two different versions
| Date : Tue, 16 May 2006 14:16:01 +0200 |
| To : <XSI(at)Softimage.COM> |
| From : "Morten Bartholdy" <xsi(at)colorshopvfx.dk> |
| Subject : Re: 1 licence for two different versions |
Morten Bartholdy 3D & VFX Artist
----- Original Message ----- From: "Raffaele Fragapane" <jaco(at)thejaco.com>
To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: 1 licence for two different versions
Bleeding people... none Crying people... none Sudden seizures.... none Lawsuits... none
nah, I'd say Kim hasn't lost his patience -yet-
****************************** | Raffaele Fragapane | | Rising Sun Pictures | | "Remember, TD is for TopDog" | ******************************
Morten Bartholdy wrote:
So now you finally lost your patience Kim ;)
- Morten
----- Original Message ----- From: "kim aldis" <kim(at)aldis.org.uk> To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 11:48 AM Subject: RE: Re[14]: 1 licence for two different versions
Licensing when you're dealing with server and application running on a
single machine isn't so much of a problem if you take the trouble to
understand how it works and work through the process logically. Christopher,
though, complicates the issue by not explaining himself very well, not
listening to what people say to him and having a poor understanding of the
tools he uses to earn a living.
He never did really explain how he fixed the problem but I think it's pretty obvious he did something with the spm_host variable while he was randomly stabbing things in the hope that they'd eventually work.
-----Original Message----- From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Tim Leydecker Sent: 16-May-2006 10:16 To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM Subject: Re: Re[14]: 1 licence for two different versions
Don?t want to start a flamewar or get insulting to anyone.
Actually, I learned quite a bit from that thread.
Licensing (the SPM host, running concurring versions all that) can be a bitchy thing and it?s shown that people here a willing to help out - even if it?s distracting from their work.
To sum it up - it probably cost a quarter million bucks in manhours (reading the posts, answering, maybe deleting them).
In the longrun it *could* save money and longhours thought.
Would be a shame if you?d unscubscribe but you?re free to do so...
Cheers
tim
----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Helzle" <xsi(at)screendream.de> To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 10:56 AM Subject: Re: Re[14]: 1 licence for two different versions
> ....or maybe create a separate mailinglist for chris. > Otherwise I think I will unsubscribe for a while. > > OMG > > Thomas Helzle > > On Sun, 14 May 2006 21:28:55 +0200, Will Mendez <xsiwill(at)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Chris, >> >> Call support on Monday, Have them do a remote support session on your >> machine so that we can finally get to the bottom of this. >> >> Regards, >> Will >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of >> kim aldis >> Sent: Sunday, May 14, 2006 12:43 PM >> To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM >> Subject: RE: Re[14]: 1 licence for two different versions >> >> Then if the value of that variable is supposed to be the name of the machine >> which is serving licenses, I'd say that's your problem. >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM >>> [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Chris >>> Sent: 14-May-2006 15:22 >>> To: kim aldis >>> Subject: Re[14]: 1 licence for two different versions >>> >>> Hello kim, no it's not the name of the computer ! >>> >>> Christopher >>> >>> >>> Sunday, May 14, 2006, 2:45:34 AM, you wrote: >>> >>> > And is SPM_x the name of your machine? >>> >>> >>> >> -----Original Message----- >>> >> From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM >>> >> [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Chris >>> >> Sent: 13-May-2006 23:14 >>> >> To: kim aldis >>> >> Subject: Re[12]: 1 licence for two different versions >>> >> >>> >> Hello kim, yes I'm running both from the same machine. >>> Did the echo >>> >> %SPM_HOST% and for the: >>> >> >>> >> 4.2 command prompt I just get this returned to me: %SPM_HOST% 5.o >>> >> command prompt I get this returned to me: SPM_x >>> >> >>> >> Christopher >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Saturday, May 13, 2006, 4:22:53 PM, you wrote: >>> >> >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> >> -----Original Message----- >>> >> >> From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM >>> >> >> [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf Of Chris >>> >> >> Sent: 13-May-2006 21:13 >>> >> >> To: kim aldis >>> >> >> Subject: Re[10]: 1 licence for two different versions >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Saturday, May 13, 2006, 3:38:27 PM, you wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> > No, I'm saying that if you're running xsi from the same >>> >> machine as >>> >> >> > the license server then you don't *have* to set the >>> >> >> spm_host variable. >>> >> >> > However, if you do then it should be correct. You haven't >>> >> >> said whether >>> >> >> > you are running from the same machine or not. I don't >>> >> know what you >>> >> >> > may have already done to those files so I don't know if you >>> >> >> should do nothing or not. >>> >> >> >>> >> >> I have done nothing to the serv.bat files at all I have >>> not edited >>> >> >> them nothing there at there default settings. >>> >> >>> >> > I asked if you were running xsi from the same machine as >>> >> the license server. >>> >> > Are you? >>> >> >>> >> > Just because you've done nothing to them doesn't mean >>> >> they're correct. >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> I have a 5.0 licence running so your right the server >>> is running. >>> >> >> And to recap 4.2 will run from 5.0 *BUT* 5.0 doesn't run >>> >> from a 5.0 >>> >> >> licence. >>> >> >>> >> > I was misunderstanding you. I thought you could run 5.0 but >>> >> not 4.2. Sorry. >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Running "echo SPM_HOST" (without the quotes) at both 5.0 and >>> >> >> 4.2 command prompt just gives me the following >>> >> >> >>> >> >> SPM >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> >> > You need to typ echo %SPM_HOST%, not echo SPM_HOST. >>> >> >>> >> > Once again, can you confirm that you're running spm on the same >>> >> > machine as you're running xsi. It has a bearing. >>> >> >>> >> > --- >>> >> > Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the >>> >> following text in body: >>> >> > unsubscribe xsi >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Best regards, >>> >> Chris mailto:walksfar(at)netscape.ca >>> >> >>> >> --- >>> >> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the >>> following text in >>> >> body: >>> >> unsubscribe xsi >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> > --- >>> > Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the >>> following text in body: >>> > unsubscribe xsi >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> Chris mailto:walksfar(at)netscape.ca >>> >>> --- >>> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in >>> body: >>> unsubscribe xsi >>> >>> >> >> --- >> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: >> unsubscribe xsi >> >> --- >> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: >> unsubscribe xsi >> > > > --- > Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: > unsubscribe xsi > --- Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe xsi
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
--- Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe xsi
--- Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe xsi
- References:
- RE: Re[14]: 1 licence for two different versions
- From: "kim aldis" <kim(at)aldis.org.uk>
- Re: Re[14]: 1 licence for two different versions
- From: "Morten Bartholdy" <xsi(at)colorshopvfx.dk>
- Re: 1 licence for two different versions
- From: Raffaele Fragapane <jaco(at)thejaco.com>
- RE: Re[14]: 1 licence for two different versions
| DATE: | << | >> | THREAD: | << | >> | INDEX: | Main | Thread |
|---|
- Previous by Date: Re: can batchserve still be used for xsi 5.1?
- Next by Date: Re: can batchserve still be used for xsi 5.1?
- Previous by Thread: Re: can batchserve still be used for xsi 5.1?
- Next by Thread: Re: can batchserve still be used for xsi 5.1?
- Index(es):
| Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available. |