[no subject]

Poly tools are great though :-D

Andy



> Andy,
> 	NURBS would have been the best method for this type of object. You are
> attempting to create what is called  "complex curvature" in NURBS-speak.
> If you were looking for the interior scoop to meet accurate
> specifications, this example would be rather difficult to reproduce via
> polys or even subDs. Not impossible, just would require immense effort.
>
> 	This is a very rudimentary type of modeling procedure for Maya, and
> it's even easier in Studio than in Maya. It could be done quite
> accurately in most solids modeling apps but solids modelers are not
> typically known for their ease of use at the interface. Morten's
> solution was quite innovative but works well only if it doesn't matter
> if the interior scoop is warped by deformation.
>
> 	Admittedly I've barely touched NURBS in XSI in recent months so I used
> this example as a refresher. I was completely unsuccessful at
> replicating it via NURBS in XSI. I am surprised to see that XSI has an
> intersection fillet feature, but lacks simple multi-surface intersection
> to generate trim curves. I'm not sure what's up with that. I hope I am
> missing something there. XSI's NURBS seems to be a real mixed bag,
> possessing some very advanced features while lacking some of the most
> simple features required to do effective NURBS modeling. I would hope
> that the NURBS toolset improves in the future. I would certianly love to
> relax my dependence on Maya for NURBS modeling, especially since I'm
> finding it far more difficult to transfer NURBS from Maya to XSI than I
> had hoped.
>
> --
>
> Joey Ponthieux
> NCI Information Systems Inc.
> NASA Langley Research Center
> ____________________________________________________________
> Opinions stated here-in are strictly those of the author and
> do not represent the opinions of NASA or any other party.
>
>
> Andy Nicholas wrote:
>>
>> Yep, NURBS occurred to me too, but how would you do this in XSI? I know
>> XSI's NURBS aren't considered to be great, but is it even possible to
>> generate this shape in XSI with a NURBS cylinder, a sphere, and some
>> trim
>> curves?
>>
>> I gave it a go as a quick test, but there doesn't seem to be an obvious
>> workflow to generate this accurately.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf
>> Of
>> Thomas Helzle
>> Sent: 22 May 2006 16:53
>> To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
>> Subject: Re: simple shape - old problem - evil result
>>
>> Wow.
>> I'm really impressed by this listing, but may I ask if NURBS are an
>> option?
>> They do what you need very easily (although not those in XSI) and can be
>> imported into XSI for rendering via IGES.
>> NURBS are how those objects are modelled originally anyway...
>>
>> And if you want to forward your design to other companies, they will ask
>> for
>> NURBS most of the time, although rapid prototyping can be done from XSI
>> polygon models with fine subdivisions exported as .obj and then
>> converted to
>> STL. I did that some months ago for a lamp design.
>>
>> Rhino is very popular, although I personally prefer SolidThinking since
>> it
>> has a history (www.solidthinking.com).
>>
>> Just a thought though :-)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Thomas Helzle
>>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
> unsubscribe xsi
>


---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi


Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.