RE: Unwrapping chrome ball pictures...

Date : Wed, 31 May 2006 05:46:41 -0700
To : <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
From : "Turner, Nathan" <nturner(at)ea.com>
Subject : RE: Unwrapping chrome ball pictures...
We have had some heavy practical experience here using Panoramic
techniques in our last game.  I would say, that for economics sake the
"Christmas Ornament" and a digital works really well.  If you want
complete accuracy.. http://www.panoscan.com/ (38,000 US)

We went with a pano head, a EOS 20D and a whole bunch of Memory Cards.
Our goal of course was to recreate the background, and look decent on
HighDef, and the technique of 1 shot up, with 10 around, separated
vertically by 45degrees worked out well.  We shot all in RAW and I found
that there is actually about 1.5 stops of extra data since Canon uses a
10bit RAW image.  Not as fast, but higher degree of accuracy.  Now for
lighting, I have to agree with Joe L., the quality of an HDR image seems
to be more like a Lambert lighting solution, than the strong lighting
you would get from a real Light source.  We always bolsterd the HDR
solution with real lights with Exponential fall off.  

There is a very cool site you should all check out,
(http://www.cs.ubc.ca/~mbrown/autostitch/autostitch.html )  More of an
intellectual experiment, than a full fledged program, but for tooling
around a bit it's great fun.  Easy panoramas, no GUI, and can be pretty
slow, but for a completely automatic panorama, it's nice.

Nathan Turner
2cents

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On Behalf
Of kim aldis
Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 5:30 PM
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: RE: Unwrapping chrome ball pictures...



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On
> Behalf Of kim aldis
> Sent: 30-May-2006 22:59
> To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
> Subject: RE: Unwrapping chrome ball pictures...
> 
> 
> 
> with a chrome ball you should be able to get more than 180. Quite a
lot
> more, depending on your distance from the ball when you take the shot.
> You can confirm this with a quick sketch. With a good long lens I
> reckon you'd be getting around 300 degrees horizontal fov. 




>Vertical obvously less.

Doh! sorry.


---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body:
unsubscribe xsi

---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi


Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.