I agree that you get a hell of a lot for an entry level price and that Fdn is not supposed to be a full production tool as such, but not allowing a .01 version bug fix does seem a little mean. A .1 upgrade maybe, but .01 ?
Of course there may be other labour intensive issues that I'm not aware of when it comes to ensuring a cut down piece of software is stable and inherits it's big brothers fixes.
To be honest I think Soft probably gave away a few too many Advanced features in Foundation in the first place.
Adam.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM]On Behalf
Of Bernard Lebel
Sent: 09 June 2006 18:14
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: Re: XSI 5.11 Announced
I think the idea behing "3Democracy" is "hobbyists and freelancers can
now get very studio-level software at a hobbyist/freelancer-level
cost."
I think in that regard it still delivers its promises..... mixed
pipelines or not. As far as mixing advess with fnd licenses go, I
always this was a risky combo, specifically for this kind of reason.
An understable combo, but a risky one nonetheless.....
Bernard
On 6/9/06, Tim Leydecker <BauerOink(at)gmx.de> wrote:
> Thomas Helzle´s reaction is therefore pretty much logic , a marketing
> statement promising 3D-democracy,
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi
