Re: Did it jump, fall or was it pushed.
| Date : Wed, 21 Jun 2006 12:57:49 +0200 |
| To : <XSI(at)Softimage.COM> |
| From : "Tim Leydecker" <BauerOink(at)gmx.de> |
| Subject : Re: Did it jump, fall or was it pushed. |
Hey Alan,
really, I´d look into using Linux. Of course have various live-CD´s laying around. A great way to save a crashed windows box....
I just meant to say I personally can´t find the time to invest in migrating from Windows to MacOS or Linux.
I allready find it hard to get any work done at all instaed of constantly keeping track of the health status of my boxes. It´s too distracting allready. I *need* to work, not install things....
Cheers
tim
----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan Jones" <skyphyr(at)gmail.com>
To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 12:06 PM
Subject: Re: Did it jump, fall or was it pushed.
Sounds like your assuming a lot of things with regards to maintenance levels on linux. Do you even bother to patch your windows box, which arguably requires it more?
Have a read of a windows user's install of ubuntu 6, which was just released. http://lenwood.cc/2006/06/17/ubuntu-rocks-on-laptops/ It's a livecd so you can check it out just by booting off the cd without installing.
Cheers,
Alan.
On 6/21/06, Tim Leydecker <BauerOink(at)gmx.de> wrote:Hi Stefan,
I´d prefer a port of shake back to Windows. Even thought w2k/xp don´t quite allow for more than 1,5/3/ GB of Ram really, Vista *may* bring things back on par with MacOS and Linux.
If I where Steve Jobs, I´d make sure *everyone* can use Shake, FinalCut, I-Movie, use the Apple Intermediate codec for HDV and basically seamlessly integrate any Mac thing in a heterogenious network by allowing to make it homogenious through BootCamp...for me only that´d be an *univeral binary*. I´d love to run FinalCut and Shake but it´s creepy to see them stick to they OS so rigidly even fining users of concurring OSes. *That´s like 1984*...
I can understand you´ve picked Linux as your tool of choice and don´t want to object against that, tho. Adobe really should look into supporting Linux. Starting now and releasing production ready when people like me, or ones coming from Mac could install (and maintain!) their Linux box as as easy as if it where XP.
Personally, I´d have allready migrated but I simply can´t put in the time to learn Linux, make sure I understand what´s going on, constantly keep everything running, all packages installed, drivers configured and kernels patched. I hate to say it but that´s too much work for me. I can hardly keep up maintaining my 2-3 windoze boxes...
Cheers
tim
P.S: I want loads of Ram, HDTV 4:4:4 editing, a breakoutbox with a 1920x1200 flatscreen, the best apps fot the task and don´t waste my time by running into limitations stubborn competitors build in to gain marketleadership or protect marketshare. Turns me off...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Stefan Andersson" <sanders3d(at)gmail.com> To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 5:32 PM Subject: Re: Did it jump, fall or was it pushed.
> from the website > ---------------------------------------------------- > Is Shake still available on Linux? > > Yes, Shake 4.1 for Linux is available through shake-sales(at)apple.com. > Pricing has not changed for Linux. > ---------------------------------------------------- > > typical... > > while being on the subject (of linux) I think that everyone here on > this list should send an email to adobe and tell them that we need a > paint option that isn't Gimp on linux (and don't even bother to tell > me about crossover and wine). > > Or.............. > > Perhaps softimage could come up with a paint package for Linux?? :) I > do know you can do it... so just do it!! (and please let it be a > standalone package) > > regards > stefan andersson > > > > > On 6/20/06, Francois Lord <francoislord(at)gmail.com> wrote: >> Is it 500$ on linux too? >> Is it still on linux? >> >> >> kim aldis wrote: >> > >> > http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2006/jun/20shake.html >> > >> > >> > >> --- >> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: >> unsubscribe xsi >> > > > -- > || Stockholm PostProduction || http://www.stopost.se || > --- > Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: > unsubscribe xsi >
--- Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe xsi
--- Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe xsi
--- Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body: unsubscribe xsi
- References:
- Did it jump, fall or was it pushed.
- From: "kim aldis" <kim(at)aldis.org.uk>
- Re: Did it jump, fall or was it pushed.
- From: Francois Lord <francoislord(at)gmail.com>
- Re: Did it jump, fall or was it pushed.
- From: "Stefan Andersson" <sanders3d(at)gmail.com>
- Re: Did it jump, fall or was it pushed.
- From: "Tim Leydecker" <BauerOink(at)gmx.de>
- Re: Did it jump, fall or was it pushed.
- From: "Alan Jones" <skyphyr(at)gmail.com>
- Did it jump, fall or was it pushed.
| DATE: | << | >> | THREAD: | << | >> | INDEX: | Main | Thread |
|---|
- Previous by Date: Re: Did it jump, fall or was it pushed.
- Next by Date: Re: Did it jump, fall or was it pushed.
- Previous by Thread: Re: Did it jump, fall or was it pushed.
- Next by Thread: Re: Did it jump, fall or was it pushed.
- Index(es):
| Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available. |