RE: RE: Replacing the shadertree? Possible?

Date : Tue, 27 Jun 2006 10:13:58 +0100
To : <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
From : "kim aldis" <kim(at)aldis.org.uk>
Subject : RE: RE: Replacing the shadertree? Possible?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On
> Behalf Of Alan Jones
> Sent: 27 June 2006 09:52
> To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
> Subject: Re: RE: Replacing the shadertree? Possible?
> 
> damn - I knew windows was really better. We don't have cupholder.
> 
> Oh wait - I just found it - our version is called eject though? Why do
> linux developers always give unintuitive names for their applications?
> 
[kim aldis] 
Because if you make things too complicated for them they blow fuses.

> 



---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi


Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.