RE: *SPAM *Re: public domain or inexpensive south manhattan 3D model

Date : Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:38:10 -0400
To : <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
From : Michaël Bentitou <michaelb(at)hybride.com>
Subject : RE: *SPAM *Re: public domain or inexpensive south manhattan 3D model
Nice - Even if the geometry is not perfect, like you say it's a good
start. I'm sure there will eventually - or probably is - other web sites
this tool could be useful. Thanks for sharing!

-=mb.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On
Behalf
> Of Andy Jones
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 4:24 PM
> To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
> Subject: *SPAM *Re: public domain or inexpensive south manhattan 3D
model
> 
> I've successfully pulled sections of Las Vegas and Los Angeles.  The
> meshes you get aren't perfect (some vertices are connected weirdly and
> such, but it's a pretty effective way to get some geometry in there
that
> has the correct layout.  I should also mention it comes in pieces due
to
> Google Earth's dynamic loading of mesh data.  You just get whatever GE
> was showing when you hit "capture."
> 
> -Andy
> 
> Michaël Bentitou wrote:
> 
> >A little while back Andy Jones from this list posted this link:
> >
> >http://ogle.eyebeamresearch.org/
> >
> >It seems you can grab anything that's using OGL, so in theory you
could
> >grab google-earth south manhattan, save it as an .obj and bring it
into
> >XSI.
> >
> >Personally I've installed the necessary software but hardly had the
> >chance to test it - work keeps getting in the way ;-)
> >
> >It would be pretty cool if it worked.
> >
> >Andy, have you had the chance to test it?
> >
> >-=mb.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On
> >>
> >>
> >Behalf
> >
> >
> >>Of Eric Deren
> >>Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2006 3:00 PM
> >>To: xsi(at)Softimage.COM
> >>Subject: public domain or inexpensive south manhattan 3D model
> >>
> >>
> >>Has anyone seen such a beast?  Not looking for tremendous detail,
just
> >>google-earth detail-level placement of buildings and such.
> >>Obviously, the more detail the better, to a point, but we're not
doing
> >>"Day After Tomorrow" so I don't need terabytes of LIDAR data.  :-)
> >>
> >>If anyone has such a thing lying around that they'd be willing to
> >>
> >>
> >donate
> >
> >
> >>or sell, that would be fantastic!  Thanks!
> >>
> >>-Eric
> >>
> >>---
> >>Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
> >>
> >>
> >body:
> >
> >
> >>unsubscribe xsi
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >---
> >Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
> body:
> >unsubscribe xsi
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body:
> unsubscribe xsi




---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in body:
unsubscribe xsi


Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.