-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM [mailto:owner-xsi(at)Softimage.COM] On
Behalf Of adrian
Sent: 04 July 2006 11:03
To: XSI(at)Softimage.COM
Subject: Re: [OT] dynamite v1.1
i agree....
over the years i have repeatedly said to anyone that would listen (and
a few that wouldn't) that 'we' the users would rather have a half
assed, badly intergrated tool, than NO TOOL AT ALL!
i give you Maya ocean as an example, ropey piece of code, limited use,
too many badly documented controls but one time in 10 it WORKS, and
that time is worth the effort, heartache and frustration of the other 9
times!
while people sit on their high horses and preach about integration and
interoperability, some guy in his bedroom writes a fluid sim for maya
(which already has one!) and sellls it, even though it's not a great
piece of code, it plugs a gap, fills a niche etc....
also, if someone released a 'poorly' developed addon, there is the
chance of people whinging about it's usefullness.... but like you said,
if it forces bigger manufacturers hand's, to release something better,
then it seems like a great idea!!
a
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stefano Jannuzzo" <stefanojannuzzo(at)tiscali.it>
To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] dynamite v1.1
> You see, these kind of tools are fun to do for a production, where
> talented td's give you in advance the limitations the software can
have.
> Turning them into a commercial product can become a nightmare.
> I've seen it all already. Today the cheapness of softwares is good
for the
> users, but it killed the 3rd party developers.
> And I'm sure, should we release (in case we 'might'), the day after
Soft
> would come up with its own.
> (In fact, that would be a good reason itself to release it. When
you've
> been waiting for the bus for ages, you light up a cigarette, and
there the
> bus comes).
> S
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "adrian" <adrian.wyer(at)fluid-pictures.com>
> To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 11:00 AM
> Subject: Re: [OT] dynamite v1.1
>
>
>> so if it was done again, with slightly different code, perhaps, it
could
>> 'maybe' be something
>> that 'might' be released as an addon, for say, oooh $100 a pop?
>>
>>
>> maybe?
>>
>> hmm?
>>
>> a
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Stefano Jannuzzo" <stefanojannuzzo(at)tiscali.it>
>> To: <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2006 9:05 AM
>> Subject: Re: [OT] dynamite v1.1
>>
>>
>>> Yes, it was done for AS, 2 years ago, out of the Fedkiw-Stam-Jensen
>>> article and some free code available.
>>> Stefano
>>>
>
> ---
> Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body:
> unsubscribe xsi
---
Unsubscribe? Mail Majordomo(at)Softimage.COM with the following text in
body:
unsubscribe xsi