RE: OT? : Mray 3.5 features

Date : Tue, 1 Aug 2006 11:16:25 -0400
To : <XSI(at)Softimage.COM>
From : "Luc-Eric Rousseau" <lucer(at)Softimage.COM>
Subject : RE: OT? : Mray 3.5 features
Title: RE: OT? : Mray 3.5 features

no, partitions and overrides are not on the mental images side.
it's something about name resolution issue that prevents overrides on clusters
There isn't necessarily anything in 3.5 that jumps out to me as immediately
fixing a problem for XSI.  As you know the XSI SubDs are implemented with
a geometry shader and are quite performance- and memory-optimized in XSI 5.0.
SubDs implementations have different features and results, and a software
should still have a non-MR-dependant subdiv to use it in other places
such as simulation and opengl.  The modeling+rendering team is continuing to
track and investigate the various MR technologies and see how we can
leverage them in the future, as well as looking into the cluster material
override issue.

-----Original Message-----
From: kim aldis

Are clusters in partitions dependant upon mental ray? I wouldn't have
thought so.

From: Sam Cuttriss

Per-face data have been introduced for polygonal geometric objects. Per-face
data make it possible to attach arbitrary floating point data to the
primitives. An object may also contain per-primitive data information to
identify the data attached to the primitives.

will this feature enable clusters to be put in partitions?
just a thought
_sam


 


Search the XSI List archives here or use the advanced search form to search across mailing lists. Searching help is available.
This site supposedly brought to you by Benjamin Grosser and the Imaging Technology Group.